U.S. Supreme Court scraps arguments in Medicaid work case
FREE Breaking News Alerts from StreetInsider.com!
StreetInsider.com Top Tickers, 10/28/2026
- Wall Street ends higher as Fed holds key rate steady, focus turns to earnings
- SK Hynix shares surge after Q3 profit beats expectations
- Oil prices rise on Yemen fighting, Saudi refinery attack
- Alphabet stock rises as OpenAI plans to buy Google's TPUs
- Wendy's shares surge 16% on $1.4 billion takeover bid by Nelson Peltz’s Trian Fund
Tweet
Share
E-mail
FILE PHOTO: A man walks past the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S., June 25, 2020. REUTERS/Al Drago/
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - At the request of President Joe Biden's administration, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday canceled an upcoming oral argument on a policy introduced under his predecessor Donald Trump backing work requirements for people who receive healthcare under the Medicaid program for the poor.
The court granted a request made by Acting Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar on Feb. 22, who said the new administration has started the process of reversing the previous policy. The oral argument concerning pilot programs adopted by the states of Arkansas and New Hampshire had been scheduled for March 29.
Under Trump, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in 2018 approved the pilot projects in those two states as part of a push to put a conservative stamp on Medicaid, a program that was expanded under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, to provide medical coverage to millions more Americans.
Biden, a Democrat, succeeded Trump, a Republican, on Jan. 20. Under Biden, HHS made a preliminary finding that work requirements would be inconsistent with the objectives of Medicaid, which provides medical insurance for the poor, Prelogar told the court.
Biden's Justice Department has reversed course in several cases originally filed by the Trump administration. In response to one such shift, the court on Tuesday dismissed an upcoming case on Trump's policy barring immigrants deemed likely to need government benefits from legal permanent residency.
The Supreme Court on Feb. 3 canceled oral arguments in two other cases after Biden's administration changed course from Trump policies. Both were appeals by Trump's administration - one defending his funding of the U.S.-Mexico border wall and the other defending his so-called "remain in Mexico" asylum policy.
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Utah criminally charges Kalshi with promoting illegal gambling
- Zillow to pay $212.5 million to settle class action over failed real estate venture
- Trading Day: Fed pauses, Big Tech reports
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
ReutersRelated Entities
Donald J. TrumpSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!
