Form 424B3 Hyperliquid Strategies

Prospectus Supplement No. 3

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)

File No. 333-291017

Hyperliquid Strategies Inc

477 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor

New York, NY 10022

(212) 883-4330

Prospectus Supplement No. 3

(to the Prospectus dated December 2, 2025)

This Prospectus Supplement No. 3 supplements and amends the prospectus dated December 2, 2025 (the “Prospectus”), relating to the potential offer and sale from time to time by Chardan Capital Markets LLC of an aggregate of up to 160,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Common Stock”).

On August 27, 2026, we filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission the attached Annual Report on Form 10-K.

This Prospectus Supplement No. 3 should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and is qualified by reference to the Prospectus except to the extent that the information in this Prospectus Supplement No. 3 supersedes the information contained in the Prospectus.

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC under the symbol “PURR”. On August 26, 2026, the last reported sale price of our common stock was $11.56 per share.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 15 of the Prospectus dated December 2, 2025.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this Prospectus Supplement No. 3 is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this Prospectus Supplement No. 3 is August 27, 2026.

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026

OR

Commission File Number 001-42985

Hyperliquid Strategies Inc

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 883-4241

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of December 31, 2025 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the registrant’s common stock Market Value held by non-affiliates was $441.8 million.

As of August 23, 2026, there were 197,837,597 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding, par value $0.01 per share.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the close of the registrant’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2026, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent stated herein.

Table of Contents

Unless the context otherwise requires, throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), the words “HSI,” “we,” “us,” or the “Company” refer to Hyperliquid Strategies Inc and its subsidiaries (as applicable).

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report and some of the information incorporated herein by reference includes forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, our plans, strategies and prospects, both business and financial. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that we will achieve or realize these plans, intentions or expectations. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Generally, statements that are not historical facts, including statements concerning possible or assumed future actions, business strategies, events or results of operations, and any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. These statements may be preceded by, followed by or include the words “believes,” “continues,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “seeks,” “plans,” “scheduled,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “aims,” “works,” “focuses,” “aspires,” “strives” or “sets out” or similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance, and the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward looking. You should understand that the following important factors could affect our future results, and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements herein:

The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. You should carefully consider the foregoing factors and the other risks and uncertainties described in “Item 1A - Risk Factors” of the other documents we file from time to time with the SEC. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Overview

We are a Delaware corporation and U.S. publicly listed digital asset treasury company. Our primary business is accumulating HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid Layer 1 blockchain ecosystem (“HYPE” or “HYPE Tokens”), on behalf of our stockholders. The Company’s primary strategic objective is to benefit from the growth of the Hyperliquid ecosystem directly through its ownership of HYPE tokens, through pursuing income earning activities related to the Hyperliquid ecosystem, or by otherwise fostering growth of the Hyperliquid ecosystem. The Hyperliquid ecosystem has positioned itself to play an increasingly larger role in the global financial system, and the Company believes finding ways in which to participate in its growth offers the potential to generate long-term value for the Company’s stockholders. There can be no assurance, however, as to the future growth of the Hyperliquid protocol or the value of the HYPE token.

We were formed on July 2, 2025 as a holding and operating company. Our wholly owned subsidiary, Rorschach I LLC (“Rorschach”) is a Delaware limited liability company formed on June 13, 2025 as the vehicle through which founding investors contributed HYPE tokens and cash to establish the Company’s initial treasury.

On July 11, 2025, Sonnet BioTherapeutics Holdings, Inc. (“Sonnet”), the Company, Rorschach, TBS Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary (“Sonnet Merger Sub”) and Rorschach Merger Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary (“Rorschach Merger Sub”) entered into a Business Combination Agreement, dated July 11, 2025 (the “Transaction Agreement”), pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Transaction Agreement, (i) Rorschach Merger Sub would merge with and into Rorschach with Rorschach surviving the merger (the “Rorschach Merger”) as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and (ii) immediately following the Rorschach Merger, Sonnet Merger Sub would merge with and into Sonnet, with Sonnet surviving the merger (the “Sonnet Merger”, and, together with the Rorschach Merger, the “Mergers” or “Transactions”) as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

On December 2, 2025 (the “Closing Date”), we completed the Transactions with Sonnet, at which point the Company became a publicly listed entity on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol “PURR.”

At the closing of the Transactions (the “Closing”), the Company held approximately 12.5 million HYPE tokens contributed through Rorschach and approximately $299.9 million in cash proceeds from the Closing PIPE (as defined below). As of August 23, 2026, the Company holds approximately 29.4 million HYPE tokens, which it believes represents the largest HYPE holdings of any U.S. public company. The Company’s HYPE balance is published on its website (hypestrat.xyz), updated weekly with a one-week data delay.

On March 31, 2026, we entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “APA”) with Guidant Biotherapeutics, Inc. (“Guidant”), a newly-formed company, where we completed the sale of most of Sonnet’s assets to Guidant, a newly-formed company, in exchange for shares of Guidant’s common stock. Following the transaction, the Company’s operations are focused on its HYPE digital asset treasury strategy, though it continues to wind down its remaining Sonnet operations, including certain clinical trials.

Overview of the Hyperliquid Ecosystem

Hyperliquid is a Layer 1 blockchain designed to support a fully on-chain open financial system.

Designed and optimized from first principles to upgrade the financial system, it is best known for trading spot pairs and perpetual futures (“perps”), processing billions in daily trading volume.

As of August 23, 2026, Hyperliquid accounts for approximately 40.1% of total on-chain perpetuals 24 hour volume globally and 62.5% of on-chain perps open interest. Since inception, cumulative perps trading volume on Hyperliquid has exceeded $5.4 trillion, and in 2025 the protocol generated approximately $857 million in net protocol revenue, based on publicly available data.

The protocol’s state execution is divided into two core components:

Based on publicly available information, Hyperliquid is designed to operate as open financial infrastructure with the following characteristics:

Hyperliquid provides the liquidity infrastructure for developers to build financial applications, extending the Hyperliquid ecosystem beyond trading into borrowing, lending, minting compliant stablecoins, and launching perpetual contracts on any asset.

HIP-3: Permissionless Perpetual Markets

In November 2025, Hyperliquid launched HIP-3, a permissionless market framework that enables third-party deployers to create new perpetual markets directly on the Hyperliquid order book by bonding HYPE as collateral. HIP-3 extended Hyperliquid’s perpetual futures infrastructure beyond digital asset contracts to include contracts referencing equities, commodities, indices, and other real-world assets.

As of August 23, 2026, HIP-3 markets represent approximately 48.0% of total trading volume on Hyperliquid on a 30 day trailing basis and have driven over $514 billion in cumulative volume since launch. If this activity continues, HIP-3 may have a positive effect on demand for HYPE tokens, as HYPE is required as collateral for all HIP-3 market deployments, though no assurance can be given as to the effect on trading volumes, HYPE demand, or HYPE’s market price.

HIP-4: Event and Prediction Markets

Future protocol developments may include HIP-4, which, if implemented, would introduce event-based contracts that could enable prediction markets, options, and other structured financial products on the Hyperliquid infrastructure. HYPE is anticipated to serve as collateral and settlement currency for HIP-4 markets, though no assurance can be given that HIP-4 will be implemented or will have the characteristics described. Additional potential developments include continued growth in spot markets, further decentralization of the validator set, and the rollout of additional HIPs.

The Assistance Fund

The Hyperliquid protocol maintains a reserve known as the Assistance Fund, which is funded through protocol fee revenues and used to purchase HYPE tokens from the open market on a continuous basis. Currently, 99% of all fees generated by the protocol are allocated to the Assistance Fund. The Assistance Fund’s fee allocation was increased from 97% to 99% following an announcement by Hyperliquid on August 26, 2025. A portion of the HYPE tokens acquired by the Assistance Fund may be sent to a burn wallet to be permanently removed from circulation. As of August 23, 2026, 46.7 million HYPE tokens have been acquired by the Assistance Fund and permanently removed from circulation, representing 4.7% of the total initial supply. This mechanism links protocol fee revenues directly to open-market HYPE purchases and, if protocol transaction volumes grow, may contribute positively to demand for HYPE tokens. No assurance can be given, however, as to the effect of this mechanism on the market price of HYPE.

Overview of the HYPE Token

HYPE is the native token of the Hyperliquid ecosystem. It is used for governance, staking, fee payment, protocol incentives, and collateral across the Hyperliquid infrastructure. As of August 23, 2026, HYPE is among the top ten network tokens by market capitalization as reported by CoinMarketCap.com.

The HYPE token was launched in November 2024 via the Genesis airdrop event on November 29, 2024, distributing 31% of the total supply to approximately 100,000 eligible users based on prior protocol activity. The total supply of HYPE tokens is capped at 1 billion, with no further HYPE tokens currently expected to be issued beyond this cap.

Token Supply and Allocation

The maximum supply of 1 billion HYPE tokens has been allocated as follows:

As of August 23, 2026, HYPE had a circulating supply of approximately 235.0 million tokens out of a total supply of 1 billion tokens, based on information from by Hypeburn.fun and the Hyperliquid blockchain. The HYPE token is the native gas token for the HyperEVM, and both base fees and priority fees are burned for every transaction. To date, transaction fees have burned approximately 0.1% of the total supply, according to publicly available data.

The combination of a fixed maximum supply of 1 billion HYPE tokens, the protocol’s Assistance Fund buyback mechanism, and the gas burn mechanics may result in a decline in the circulating supply of HYPE over time. This would contribute to deflationary pressure on circulating supply. The precise timing and magnitude of any such trend cannot be predicted and no assurance can be given that a decline in circulating supply will result in any increase in the market price of HYPE.

Token Utility

HYPE serves multiple utility functions within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, including:

As the Hyperliquid protocol continues to evolve through additional HIPs and ecosystem development, the utility functions of HYPE may expand across trading, governance, collateral, and application-layer use cases, though no assurance can be given as to the nature or timing of any such developments.

Token Transaction Lifecycle

The lifecycle of a HYPE token transaction begins with user initiation. A user connects a wallet and deposits tokens into the Hyperliquid ecosystem through a relevant interface, specifying details such as recipient address, amount, and transaction type, signed with a private key. Any proposed and signed transaction is broadcasted to the Hyperliquid network, where it enters the mempool and awaits validation by network nodes. Validators using the HyperBFT consensus mechanism then validate the transaction — verifying sufficient balance, correct signatures, and other parameters — in near-real time with sub-second finality. Upon validation, the transaction is added to a block. The transaction record is immutable upon inclusion in the blockchain’s distributed ledger and is reflected in the user’s wallet balance, with any associated fees deducted in HYPE tokens.

Emissions and Inflation

Staking rewards for HYPE tokens are sourced from the protocol’s sustainable emissions reserve, with the reward model designed after Ethereum’s staking economics. The annual staking reward rate is dynamically calculated to be inversely proportional to the square root of the total number of HYPE tokens staked across the network. Rewards accrue every minute and are distributed daily to stakers, with automatic restaking and redelegation to compound rewards. As of August 23, 2026, with approximately 436.17 million HYPE tokens staked, with an approximate net annualized staking reward rate of 2.19%.

This emissions model, in combination with the Assistance Fund’s continuous buyback mechanism and the HyperEVM fee burn, is designed to limit inflationary pressure on the circulating supply of HYPE while supporting long-term network participation. No assurance can be given that this design will achieve its intended effect or that the rate of inflation will not increase.

Company Strategy

The Company’s primary strategic objective is to benefit from the growth of the Hyperliquid ecosystem directly through ownership of HYPE tokens, through income earning activities related to Hyperliquid, or indirectly by fostering growth of the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

As part of this, the Company accumulates HYPE tokens on behalf of its stockholders and to participate in the Hyperliquid ecosystem over the long term. The Company intends to implement this objective by using current available cash as well as any future capital-raising transactions to accumulate HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

In addition to its HYPE token accumulation strategy, the Company seeks to generate income through the selective deployment of its HYPE holdings. The Company’s current primary income-generating activity is staking substantially all of its HYPE holdings, which the Company expects will generate ongoing staking rewards. To a lesser degree, secondary income-generating activities may include appropriate DeFi-related activities within the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Any non-staking DeFi-related activities will only be undertaken after thorough internal reviews and assessments — including legal, operational, risk, and compliance reviews — confirming that the Company’s principal HYPE holdings will not be affected.

On an opportunistic basis, the Company may selectively deploy a portion of its HYPE holdings or future capital-raising proceeds into mergers and acquisitions involving businesses operating within or related to the Hyperliquid ecosystem. The Company may consider acquiring other digital asset treasury companies holding HYPE positions or entities that directly contribute to or operate within the Hyperliquid blockchain and its DeFi infrastructure.

The Company's strategy provides investors with a means of obtaining exposure to the Hyperliquid ecosystem through its direct HYPE token ownership, its deployment of HYPE tokens to generate additional income, and its engagement with the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

As captured in the Company’s Treasury Strategy Policy Handbook (the “Treasury Strategy Policy”), the Company pursues this objective through a disciplined three-pillar treasury strategy consisting of capital raising, capital allocation, and capital deployment.

Capital Raising Framework

The Company seeks to raise capital primarily through the issuance of the Company Common Stock in registered public offerings, at-the-market (“ATM”) programs, or other equity transactions when it believes its shares are trading at a premium to its market net asset value (“mNAV”) ratio, which we define as the ratio of the Company’s total market capitalization to its net asset value (“NAV”), with NAV calculated as the reported stockholders’ equity of the Company, adjusted to reflect, among other things, (i) the fair market value of the Company’s HYPE token holdings as of the applicable measurement date, (ii) the net proceeds of any capital raises completed after the most recent balance sheet date, and (iii) the cost of any HYPE tokens acquired after the most recent balance sheet date. The Company may also, from time to time, consider selling HYPE tokens to replenish working capital or to fund share repurchases when it determines that the market price of HYPE exceeds its internal estimate of the token’s fundamental long-term value.

All capital-raising decisions are made by the Company’s Treasury Committee — comprised of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer — and are subject to Company Board oversight. Equity sales generally require an mNAV above an established target ratio, while HYPE token sales are conditioned on the Company’s assessment that the prevailing market price exceeds fundamental value.

The Company will not conduct equity sales while an active share repurchase program is in effect, and maintains strict policies to ensure compliance with applicable securities laws, including Regulation FD and applicable blackout periods.

Capital Allocation Framework

The Company maintains a structured capital allocation framework that categorizes its treasury assets into three primary reserves:

The Company regularly reviews and rebalances its reserves to ensure adequate liquidity and to manage counterparty and concentration risks. All material allocations are subject to review by the Treasury Committee and, where appropriate, the Company Board.

Capital Deployment Framework

The Company deploys capital with the objective of increasing HYPE exposure per share of the Company Common Stock over time. Deployment decisions are guided by two primary conditions:

All deployment activities are executed in accordance with pre-approved trading plans, best-execution principles, and strict market practice and compliance policies designed to minimize market impact and avoid any appearance of manipulation. The Company maintains robust counterparty due diligence, multi-signature controls, and real-time monitoring procedures for all deployment transactions.

This three-pillar framework is reviewed at least annually by the Company Board and is designed to ensure that all treasury strategy activities are conducted in a disciplined, transparent, and shareholder-aligned manner.

The Advisor Agreements

Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, in connection with and at the Closing, the Company and Rorschach Advisors LLC (the "Advisor") entered into an Advisor Rights Agreement (the "Advisor Rights Agreement") and an Advisory Agreement (the "Advisory Agreement", together with the Advisor Rights Agreement, the "Advisor Agreements").

Pursuant to the Advisor Rights Agreement, among other things, for so long as the Advisor and its affiliates continue to own at least 10% of the total number of shares of our Common Stock held by the Advisor as of immediately following the Closing (the “Minimum Holding Condition”), the Advisor will have the right to nominate a number of persons (the “Advisor Directors”) to the Company Board equal to the result of (rounded up to the nearest whole number) (a) the percentage determined by dividing (i) the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the Advisor (together with its affiliates) (on an “as-converted” and “as exercised” basis and without applying any “blocker” provisions limiting the exercise or conversion of any securities held by any such person) by (ii) the total number of shares of Common Stock then outstanding (on an “as-converted” and “as exercised” basis), multiplied by (b) the then current size of the Company Board (counting, for purposes of such determination, all vacancies as filled), but in any event at least one director, who shall be the Chairman of the Company Board. In addition, for so long as the Minimum Holding Condition is satisfied, we will take all necessary

action to cause the Company Board to be comprised of at least five directors, including the Advisor Directors, and to consist of the requisite number of directors meeting the independence requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market (or other securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then listed).

The Advisor Rights Agreement also provides the Advisor with certain information rights. It also subjects the (i) 7,761,860 shares (the “Advisor Issued Shares”) of Common Stock of the Company and (ii) up to 27,394,800 shares of the Common Stock of the Company (the “Advisor Warrant Shares”; together with the Advisor Issued Shares, collectively, the “Advisor Shares”) issuable upon the exercise of 27,394,800 warrants of the Company issued to the Advisor (the “Advisor Warrants”) to lock-up restrictions applicable, subject to certain exceptions, for a period ending on the earlier of (x) the first anniversary of the Closing Date, (y) the date on which we complete a liquidation, merger, stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of Common Stock for cash, securities or other property, or (z) with respect to any securities subject to the lock-up, the date on which the last sale price of the Common Stock equals or exceeds an amount per share of Common Stock equal to 150% of the price (or deemed price) for which the Advisor acquired such securities for any 20 trading days within any 30 trading day period.

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to provide to us with certain technical advisory services related to the digital asset ecosystem, including Hyperliquid and related digital assets, developments in digital asset industries, the selection of third-party vendors with respect to asset management and related digital asset services and other strategic advice regarding digital assets treasury operations for a term of five years (subject to earlier termination under certain circumstances). The Advisory Agreement provides that, unless otherwise agreed by Advisor and subject in all respects to applicable law, in the event that we raise equity or equity-linked financing during the term, the Advisor will be entitled to receive grants of equity in the form of (a) shares of Common Stock equal to 5% of the number of shares of Common Stock issued or issuable pursuant to such financing and (b) warrants to purchase an aggregate number of shares of Common Stock equal to 15% of the number of shares of Common Stock issued or issuable pursuant to such financing, in substantially the same form as the Advisor Warrants, or as otherwise may be agreed by us and the Advisor. The Advisor has waived its right to receive such additional equity grants on account of any equity or equity-linked financing consummated by the Company following the Closing, unless and until it revokes such waiver with respect to future financings. The Advisor shall also be entitled to receive such additional compensation, if any, as may be approved by the Company Board.

At the Closing, pursuant to the terms of the Transaction Agreement, the Company issued 7,761,860 Advisor Issued Shares and 27,394,800 Advisor Warrants to the Advisor.

Sources and Uses of Capital for HYPE Accumulation

The Company received gross cash proceeds of approximately $299.9 million from the Closing PIPE. In addition, investors contributed approximately 12.5 million HYPE tokens at the Closing of the Transactions.

In addition to the Closing PIPE, the Company has established the Equity Facility, providing capacity to sell up to $1.0 billion of Company Common Stock, and continues to evaluate additional capital-raising opportunities. Proceeds from the Transactions and any other capital-raising activities are held in U.S. dollars until deployed in accordance with the Treasury Strategy Policy.

The Company intends to deploy proceeds from the Closing PIPE along with proceeds from other capital raising activities, subject to retaining a cash reserve sufficient to cover working capital requirements equal to 12 to 24 months of projected operating expenses.

HYPE Token Holdings

As of August 23, 2026, the Company holds approximately 29.4 million HYPE tokens, based on the deployment of proceeds from the Closing PIPE and other capital-raising activities, together with the approximately 12.5 million HYPE tokens received in the Contribution. The Company’s HYPE balance is tracked on its website (hypestrat.xyz), updated weekly with a one-week delay in underlying data. The Company believes its current HYPE holdings represent the largest holdings of any U.S. public company.

HYPE Staking Strategy

The Company stakes substantially all of its total HYPE token holdings, subject to ongoing risk assessments and market conditions, in order to generate staking rewards and participate in the security and consensus of the Hyperliquid network. The Company’s staking program prioritizes security, liquidity, and compliance.

Mechanics of Staking

Staking HYPE tokens refers to the process by which holders of HYPE lock or delegate their tokens to support the security, consensus, and operations of the Hyperliquid network, in exchange for potential rewards and other benefits. This mechanism is integral to the protocol’s delegated proof-of-stake (“DPoS”) consensus model, known as HyperBFT, which supports distributed validation of transactions and block production.

At present, staking HYPE tokens occurs exclusively within the HyperCore infrastructure. To initiate staking, a staker must first transfer HYPE tokens from a spot account to a dedicated staking account. This transfer is instantaneous and incurs no fees. Once in the staking account, the staker delegates its HYPE tokens to one or more validators — entities responsible for producing blocks and participating in consensus. Delegation is flexible, allowing stakers to allocate tokens across multiple validators without restriction.

Each delegation is subject to an initial one-day lock-up period, during which the tokens cannot be undelegated. After this period, stakers may partially or fully undelegate at any time, with the undelegated balance immediately returning to the staking account for potential redelegation or withdrawal.

Staking Rewards

Staking rewards are calculated on-chain, where the annual reward rate is inversely proportional to the square root of the total HYPE tokens staked across the network. For example, at a total staked amount of 436.17 million HYPE, the estimated net annualized reward rate was 2.17% as of August 23, 2026. Rewards accrue every minute and are distributed daily, with automatic compounding by redelegation to chosen validators. These rewards are funded from the protocol’s future emissions reserve.

Staking rewards are received in the form of HYPE tokens, which are added to the Company’s treasury holdings net of any fees paid to the validator of the staking node. Staking also confers governance rights, enabling participation in on-chain decisions, including voting to jail underperforming validators.

Fee Discount Tiers

Staking HYPE also provides tiered discounts on trading fees based on the amount of HYPE staked. These tiers, implemented effective May 5, 2025, are as follows:

To the extent multiple orders are executed through the same trading wallet and order volumes accumulate in such trading wallets, volume-based fee discounts may also apply. As the Company’s execution strategies include executing orders through multiple trading wallets as well as executing orders through trading service providers, the relevant discount on trading fees received varies per order. To date, such discounts have ranged from no discount to 30%.

Company Validator Operations

On May 13, 2026, the Company launched a validator node on the Hyperliquid network under the name “Hyperliquid Strategies x Unit” (the “Validator”) and engaged Nexus Research Labs, Inc., parent of Unit Labs (the “Operator”), to provide technical validator operation services for the Validator (discussed below). The newly launched Validator operates within the HyperCore infrastructure and participates in the HyperBFT consensus mechanism, producing blocks and validating transactions alongside the network’s existing active validators. The Validator is able to accept delegations from third-party HYPE holders, deepening the Company’s participation in and contribution to the Hyperliquid ecosystem’s security and decentralization. The newly launched Validator operations are subject to the same performance standards, jailing criteria, and uptime requirements applicable to all Hyperliquid validators. The Operator is responsible for the day-to-day technical operation of the validator infrastructure under a service-level agreement with the Company under specific guidelines that were negotiated to ensure compliance with the Company’s staking risk management framework.

Under the validator agreement, the Operator develops, deploys, operates and maintains the Company’s validator infrastructure subject to customary service-level commitments, including uptime, security-patching and incident-response obligations, with periodic performance reporting. The Operator is obligated to reimburse the Company for slashing penalties and missed staking rewards resulting from the Operator’s breach of the service levels or its gross negligence, willful misconduct or fraud, subject to a customary liability cap. The agreement contains mutual indemnification provisions, has an initial one-year term that renews automatically for successive one-year terms unless either party elects not to renew on customary notice, and may be terminated by either party under customary circumstances. The Validator’s commission rate is currently 2%. The Operator is paid a service fee equal to a fixed percentage of that commission, and the Company retains the balance. The Company does not expect the amounts payable to it under this arrangement to be material to its revenues or financial results.

As of August 23, 2026, the Company staked approximately 21.3 million HYPE tokens, representing approximately 72.5% of its total staked HYPE, to the Validator, and delegated approximately 8.1 million HYPE tokens, representing approximately 27.5%, to Anchorage (which was the only third-party validator used by the Company as of that date). Also as of that date, third parties had delegated approximately 1.3 million HYPE tokens to the Validator, representing approximately 5.9% of the total HYPE staked to the Validator.

Staking Provider Selection

Since the establishment of the Validator in May 2026, the Company stakes the substantial majority of its HYPE tokens to the Validator. To the extent the Company stakes or delegates HYPE other than to the Validator, to date it has done so through Anchorage, its qualified custodian, which facilitates staking as part of the custody services it provides, under the arrangement described under “Custody of the Company’s HYPE Tokens” below. Anchorage has partnered with Figment to provide an institutional grade validator infrastructure, which provides staking services to the Company at a commission rate of 10%. The Company may unstake HYPE delegated to the Anchorage validator at any time with the ability to transfer any unstaked HYPE tokens subject to the seven day unlock period prescribed by the Hyperliquid protocol. The Company intends to continue to engage reputable third-party staking providers to facilitate staking operations, leveraging their specialized infrastructure and expertise in validator management. Criteria for selecting staking providers include regulatory compliance, a proven track record in secure staking services, insurance coverage for staked assets, transparent fee structures, integration with qualified custodians, and demonstrated uptime and performance in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

The Company may engage multiple third-party staking providers to diversify risk and improve staking efficiency. Allocations among providers are determined based on quantitative and qualitative factors including historical performance metrics (yield rates, uptime, and slashing incidents), security and insurance coverage, fee competitiveness, integration compatibility with the Company’s custodian or custodians, and alignment with the Company’s risk management framework, including limits on concentration exposure to any single provider. Allocations are periodically reviewed and adjusted by the Company with the objective of maximizing risk-adjusted staking returns while maintaining the staking program’s focus on security and liquidity.

Staking Risk Management

To manage liquidity risks associated with staking, the Company implements the following risk management practices:

The Company’s staking program may evolve based on regulatory developments, network upgrades, or changes in staking mechanics within the protocol, with all decisions properly reviewed, approved, and documented.

Validator Infrastructure

Validators operate within the HyperCore infrastructure, leveraging the HyperBFT consensus algorithm, which processes transactions in discrete rounds requiring signatures from a quorum — more than two-thirds of total staked HYPE — for commitment. The network currently has 27 active validators. Validators must self-delegate a minimum of 10,000 HYPE tokens to become eligible and may receive delegations from other HYPE holders, increasing their total stake and influence in consensus.

To become an active validator, an entity must meet technical requirements including minimum hardware specifications (at least 4 CPU cores, 32 GB RAM, and 200 GB disk space), operate using the protocol’s open-source node software, and achieve a position in the top 27 validators by total stake. Validator rewards are proportional to total stake and are modeled after Ethereum’s staking economics. Validators may impose commissions on delegator rewards, typically ranging from 1% to 5%, with increases capped at 1% per staking epoch to protect stakers.

Custody of the Company’s HYPE Tokens

The Company holds substantially all of its HYPE tokens in a custody account at a regulated digital asset custodian, and expects to continue to hold substantially all of its HYPE tokens in custody accounts at one or more well-regarded regulated digital asset custodians. As a result, the primary counterparty risk the Company is exposed to with respect to its HYPE token holdings is the performance obligations under the relevant custody arrangement or arrangements.

In light of the significant amount of HYPE tokens the Company holds, it expects to evaluate additional digital asset custodians to diversify custody of its HYPE tokens. The Company selected its current custodian, and intends to select any additional custodians, after undertaking a thorough due diligence process, evaluating factors including: (i) strict security protocols including multifactor authentication procedures, (ii) robust insurance coverage against risks such as cyberattacks, theft, loss, or operational failures, (iii) offline or “cold” storage of private keys, (iv) multi-signature custody controls, and (v) regulatory compliance credentials.

Substantially all of the Company’s HYPE tokens are currently held by Anchorage, a federally chartered digital asset bank and qualified custodian. The Company has entered into a master custody services agreement (the “Custody Agreement”) with Anchorage. Under the Custody Agreement, in consideration for Anchorage providing custody services, the Company pays fees depending on the assets under custody (“AUC”) tier, ranging from 13 annual basis points for AUC up to and under $250 million to 11 annual basis points for AUC greater than $250 million. The Custody Agreement also provides that Anchorage will offer staking validator services in exchange for a fee equal to 10% of the staking rewards earned by the Company from an Anchorage validator. The Custody Agreement has an initial term of three years and automatically renews for additional one-year terms unless either party provides at least 30 days’ notice prior to the end of the then-current term, subject to earlier termination for cause.

Under the Custody Agreement, private keys for HYPE tokens are maintained in offline cold storage using air-gapped hardware security modules (“HSMs”) distributed across secure locations. Anchorage’s custody approach includes segregated, bankruptcy-remote accounts that keep client assets separated from other assets and verifiable on-chain; and passwordless user authentication with biometric verification integrated with behavioral analytics and multi-factor authentication on pre-enrolled devices. Regulatory compliance is upheld through Anchorage’s status as a federally chartered digital asset bank, regular audits, and SOC 1 Type 2 certification.

The Company also conducts ongoing due diligence reviews during the custodial relationship to monitor the safekeeping of its HYPE tokens. As part of this process, the Company obtains and reviews its custodian’s Services Organization Controls reports and reviews relevant internal controls through a variety of methods.

The Company’s HYPE token accumulation transactions are executed primarily in coordination with reputable digital asset trading service providers, which may in certain cases be affiliated with the Company’s custodian. Counterparties that the Company has entered into execution agreements with to date include Flowdesk, Anchorage, Galaxy, IMC and Coinbase. To the extent that any service provider is affiliated with our custodian, conflicts of interest may arise. For more information, please see “Item 1A – Risk Factors — Risks Related to the Company’s Business – We face risks relating to the custody of our HYPE, including the loss or destruction of private keys required to access our HYPE, cyberattacks or other data loss relating to our HYPE, including smart contract related losses and vulnerabilities, and potential conflicts of interest.” The Company conducts extensive due diligence on counterparties’ compliance and risk infrastructure prior to engagement. Material agreement terms typically include best-execution obligations, capped fees, multi-signature custody with audit rights, indemnification for counterparty negligence, and termination rights. Where the Company utilizes affiliates of its HYPE custodian for transaction execution, it requires full transparency of counterparty actions, ethical walls, and independent oversight to ensure best execution and fair treatment.

The Company has negotiated contractual terms with its custodian, and expects to negotiate contractual terms with any additional custodians it may engage, that it believes establish, under existing law, that the Company’s property interest in custodied HYPE tokens is not subject to claims by the custodian’s creditors in the event the custodian enters bankruptcy, receivership, or similar insolvency proceedings.

Incidental Rights

The Company may have incidental rights to passively receive additional benefits or digital assets arising from its HYPE token holdings during events such as airdrops, hard forks, or similar events. While such events have the potential to create value for the Company, they may also introduce risks including security vulnerabilities, regulatory compliance issues, tax liabilities, and operational complexities. The Company intends to implement policies aimed at prioritizing security, compliance, and alignment with its overall treasury strategy. Key elements of these policies are expected to include:

Government Regulation

The laws and regulations applicable to HYPE tokens and other digital assets are evolving and subject to interpretation and change. Governments around the world have reacted differently to digital assets; certain governments have deemed them illegal, and others have allowed their use and trade without restriction, while in jurisdictions such as the United States, transactions involving digital assets are subject to overlapping, uncertain, and evolving regulatory requirements. The application of state and federal securities laws and other laws and regulations to transactions involving digital assets is evolving and unclear in certain respects, and it is possible that regulators in the United States or foreign countries may interpret or apply existing laws and regulations in a manner that adversely affects the operations or functionality of Hyperliquid, the price of HYPE tokens, or the ability of individuals or institutions such as the Company to own or transfer HYPE tokens.

The U.S. federal government, states, regulatory agencies, and foreign governments may enact new laws and regulations, or pursue regulatory, legislative, enforcement, or judicial actions, that could materially impact the price of HYPE tokens or the ability of individuals or institutions such as the Company to own or transfer HYPE tokens. Among recent significant regulatory developments:

Classification of HYPE as a Commodity

Neither the SEC nor any other U.S. federal or state regulator has publicly stated whether the HYPE token is a “security”, nor has any court addressed the status of the HYPE token under the U.S. federal securities laws or similar laws. Therefore, while we believe that the HYPE token is not a “security” within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws, and registration of the Company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”) is therefore not required under the applicable securities laws, a regulator or federal court may determine otherwise. Our belief, even if reasonable under the circumstances, would not preclude legal or regulatory action based on such a finding that the HYPE token is a “security” or that transactions in HYPE tokens constitute “securities transactions,” which could require us to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

This belief is premised, among other reasons, on the Company’s conclusion that HYPE does not meet the elements of the Howey test, is not a security, and is not bought and sold in securities transactions. Rather, the Company believes the HYPE token is a commodity not subject to U.S. securities laws.

In March 2026, the SEC issued an interpretive release addressing the application of U.S. federal securities laws to digital assets and transactions involving digital assets. The interpretive release describes “digital commodities” as digital assets intrinsically linked to and deriving their value from the programmatic operation of a functional crypto system and supply and demand dynamics, rather than from the expectation of profits from the essential managerial efforts of others. The release further notes that digital commodities do not have intrinsic economic properties conveying rights to future income, profits, or assets of a business enterprise, and are necessary to participate in or use certain aspects of the associated functional crypto system. The Company believes the characteristics of HYPE are consistent with this description. However, the interpretive release does not have the force and effect of law, and a regulator or court may reach a different conclusion.

CFTC Jurisdiction

The CFTC takes the position that some digital assets, including HYPE tokens, fall within the definition of a “commodity” under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936, as amended (the “CEA”). Under the CEA, the CFTC has broad enforcement authority to police market manipulation and fraud in spot digital asset markets. Beyond instances of fraud or manipulation, the CFTC generally does not oversee cash or spot market exchanges or transactions involving digital asset commodities that do not utilize margin, leverage, or financing — however, potential future legislation may expand the CFTC’s authority over spot digital asset transactions.

Investment Company Act

The Investment Company Act requires an issuer primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities to register as an investment company unless a valid exemption applies. The Company does not believe it is an “investment company” under either Section 3(a)(1)(A) or Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act, as it does not hold itself out as engaged primarily in investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities and does not own investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of total assets on an unconsolidated basis, given the Company’s position that HYPE tokens are not investment securities.

If the Company were deemed to be an investment company, restrictions imposed by the Investment Company Act — including limitations on issuance of different classes of stock, equity compensation, and transactions with affiliated persons — would likely make it impractical to continue the Company’s business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

Employees

As of June 30, 2026, the Company had 5 employees.

Facilities

The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 477 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10022, and the telephone number at that address is (212) 883-4241.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Investing in our Common Stock involves risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as all the other information in this Annual Report, including the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could suffer. In that event, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements.

Risk Factor Summary

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in this Item 1A, that represent challenges that we face in connection with the successful implementation of our strategy and the growth of our business. In particular, the following risks, among others, may offset our competitive strengths or have a negative effect on our business strategy, which could cause a decline in the price of our Common Stock or warrants and result in a loss of all or a portion of your investment:

Risks Related to the Company’s Business

HYPE is a highly volatile asset, and fluctuations in the price of HYPE may influence our financial results and the market price of our listed securities.

Our financial results and the market price of our listed securities would be adversely affected, and our business and financial condition would be negatively impacted, if the price of HYPE decreased substantially, including as a result of:

Due to our adoption of a cryptocurrency treasury strategy and the potential perception by our investors that the value of our listed securities as dependent upon or linked to the value or change in the value of our HYPE holdings or the availability of HYPE to be readily purchased in the United States or elsewhere, we expect to see volatility in our stock price.

There is no assurance that HYPE will maintain its value in the long or intermediate term. In the event that the price of HYPE declines, the value of the Company Common Stock may decline proportionately. The price of HYPE has historically been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile. Since December 4, 2024 (the first date for which public information of the HYPE token price is available at TradingView.com) through August 23, 2026, the token price of HYPE, based on the price reported by TradingView.com as of 23:59 p.m. UTC on each day, has ranged from as low as $10.26 (April 6, 2025) to as high as $82.28 (August 23, 2026).

HYPE and other digital assets are novel assets and are subject to significant legal and regulatory uncertainty.

HYPE and other digital assets are relatively novel and are subject to significant legal and regulatory uncertainty, which could adversely impact their price. The application of state and federal securities laws and other laws and regulations to digital assets is evolving and unclear in certain respects, and it is possible that regulators in the United States or foreign countries may interpret or apply existing laws and regulations in a manner that adversely affects the operations or functionality of Hyperliquid, the price of HYPE or the ability of individuals or institutions such as us to own or transfer HYPE.

It is not possible to predict whether or when new laws will be enacted that change the legal framework governing digital assets or provide additional authorities to the SEC or other regulators, or whether or when any other federal, state or foreign legislative bodies will take any similar actions. It is also not possible to predict the nature of any such additional laws or authorities, how additional legislation or regulatory oversight might impact the ability of digital asset markets to function, the willingness of financial and other institutions to continue to provide services to the digital assets industry, or how any new laws or regulations, or changes to existing laws or regulations,

might impact the value of digital assets generally and HYPE specifically. The consequences of any new law or regulation relating to digital assets and digital asset activities could adversely affect the market price of HYPE, as well as our ability to hold or transact in HYPE, and in turn adversely affect the market price of our listed securities.

Our HYPE treasury strategy subjects us to enhanced regulatory oversight.

There has been increasing focus on the extent to which digital assets can be used to launder the proceeds of illegal activities, fund criminal or terrorist activities, or circumvent sanctions regimes, including those sanctions imposed in response to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. We have implemented and intend to maintain policies and procedures reasonably designed to promote compliance with applicable anti-money laundering (“AML”), counter-terrorist financing and sanctions laws and regulations, including the economic sanctions programs administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) and, to the extent applicable to our activities, the Bank Secrecy Act and the regulations of the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”). For the execution of HYPE transactions through trading desks, we work together with reputable digital asset trading service providers that have what we believe to be comprehensive and robust AML policies and procedures. In addition, we have adopted policies and procedures intended to help ensure AML compliance with respect to any potential HYPE transactions, including conducting comprehensive, enterprise-wide AML risk assessments, taking steps to identify and verify counterparties and their beneficial owners where transactions are conducted with identifiable counterparties, performing ongoing sanctions screening of counterparties and wallet addresses, monitoring transactions for suspicious activities, providing training to employees and directors, and managing third-party service provider risks through due diligence and contractual requirements. However, when we acquire HYPE by transacting directly on the Hyperliquid protocol rather than through an intermediated counterparty such as an over-the-counter trading desk, we transact with anonymous on-chain liquidity and cannot identify or conduct diligence on the ultimate source of the HYPE we acquire, and in those instances we are not able to conduct any form of counterparty risk assessment. If we are found to have purchased any of our HYPE from bad actors that have used HYPE to launder money, or from persons subject to sanctions, we may be subject to regulatory proceedings, fines or other civil or criminal penalties and reputational harm, and any further transactions or dealings in HYPE by us may be restricted or prohibited

We may incur indebtedness or enter into other financial instruments in the future that may be collateralized by our HYPE holdings. We may also consider pursuing strategies to create income streams or otherwise generate funds using our HYPE holdings. These types of HYPE-related transactions are the subject of enhanced regulatory oversight. These and any other HYPE-related transactions we may enter into, beyond simply acquiring and holding HYPE, may subject us to additional regulatory compliance requirements and scrutiny, including under federal and state money services regulations, money transmitter licensing requirements and various commodity and securities laws and regulations.

Increased enforcement activity and changes in the regulatory environment, including evolving or changing interpretations and the implementation of new or varying regulatory requirements by the government or any new legislation affecting HYPE, as well as enforcement actions involving or impacting our trading venues, counterparties and custodians, may impose significant costs or significantly limit our ability to hold and transact in HYPE.

In addition, private actors that are wary of HYPE or the regulatory concerns associated with HYPE have in the past taken and may in the future take further actions that may have an adverse effect on our business or the market price of our listed securities. For example, it is possible that a financial institution could restrict customers from buying our securities if it were to determine that the value of our securities is closely tied to the performance of HYPE, signaling a reluctance to facilitate exposure to virtual currencies.

Absent federal regulations, there is a possibility that HYPE may be classified as a “security.” Any classification of HYPE as a “security” would subject us to additional regulation and could materially impact the operation of our business.

Neither the SEC nor any other U.S. federal or state regulator has publicly stated whether they believe that HYPE is a “security,” nor has any court addressed the status of HYPE under the U.S. federal securities laws or similar laws. Therefore, while (for the reasons discussed below) we believe that HYPE is not a “security” within the

meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws, and registration of the Company under the Investment Company Act is therefore not required under the applicable securities laws, a regulator or federal court may determine otherwise. Our belief, even if reasonable under the circumstances, would not preclude legal or regulatory action based on such a finding that HYPE is a “security” which could require us to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

We have implemented a process for analyzing the U.S. federal securities law status of HYPE and other cryptocurrencies as guidance and case law evolve. As part of our U.S. federal securities law analytical process, we take into account a number of factors, including the various definitions of “security” under U.S. federal securities laws and federal court decisions interpreting the elements of these definitions, such as the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in the Howey and Reves cases, as well as court rulings, reports, orders, press releases, public statements, and speeches by the SEC Commissioners and SEC Staff providing guidance on when a digital asset or a transaction to which a digital asset may relate may be a security for purposes of U.S. federal securities laws. Our position that HYPE is not a “security” is premised, among other reasons, on our conclusion that HYPE does not meet the elements of the Howey test and thus is not a security nor bought and sold in securities transactions. Rather, we believe that HYPE is a commodity not subject to the U.S. securities laws.

In March 2026, the SEC issued an interpretive release addressing the application of U.S. federal securities laws to digital assets and transactions involving digital assets. The interpretive release does not supersede or replace the Howey test but rather sets forth how the SEC applies the Howey test to digital assets and transactions involving digital assets. The SEC states within the release that it classifies digital assets into five categories based on their characteristics, uses and functions: (1) digital commodities; (2) digital collectibles; (3) digital tools; (4) stablecoins; and (5) digital securities. The release also stipulates that the SEC believes that digital assets classified as digital commodities, digital collectibles and digital tools are not securities. In the release, the SEC explained that a “digital commodity” generally refers to a digital asset that is intrinsically linked to and derives its value from the programmatic operation of a crypto system that is functional, as well as supply and demand dynamics, rather than from the expectation of profits from the essential managerial efforts of others. It further noted that a digital commodity does not have intrinsic economic properties or rights, such as generating passive yield or conveying rights to future income, profits, or assets of a business enterprise or other entity, promisor or obligor. Additionally, the release stated that a digital commodity is necessary to participate in or use certain aspects of an associated functional crypto system. The programmed purpose of a digital commodity is to facilitate and incentivize the validation, ordering and confirmation of transactions on the associated functional crypto system, serve as a mechanism to maintain the functioning and/or security of the associated functional crypto system, and foster network effects. Accordingly, a digital commodity is integral to the operation of the associated functional crypto system. The SEC stated that digital assets classified as digital commodities are not securities because they do not constitute any of the financial instruments enumerated in the definition of “security” because, among other things, they do not represent a digitized form of any such instruments, including investment contracts.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the release is an interpretive statement of the SEC and does not have the force and effect of law, does not create binding legal rights or obligations, and is not binding on courts or other regulatory authorities. The release also makes clear that the analysis of whether a digital asset or a transaction involving a digital asset constitutes a security remains dependent on the specific facts and circumstances, including the manner in which the asset is offered, sold, or promoted. Accordingly, a digital asset that is not itself a security, including a digital commodity such as HYPE, may nonetheless be offered or sold pursuant to an investment contract, and such transactions would be subject to the federal securities laws. Accordingly, the SEC, a court or another relevant entity could take a different view. Application of securities laws to the specific facts and circumstances of digital assets is complex, evolving and subject to change. Our conclusion, even if reasonable under the circumstances, would not preclude legal or regulatory action based on a finding that HYPE, or any other digital asset we might hold is a “security.” As such, we are at risk of enforcement proceedings and lawsuits against us or others, which could result in potential injunctions, cease-and-desist orders, fines and penalties if HYPE is determined by a regulatory body or a court to be a security or to be bought and sold in securities transactions. Such developments would adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

Due to the complexity and uncertainty of applying the federal securities and similar laws to digital assets, as well as the fact that different companies doing business in the digital asset industry take varying approaches to analyzing the security status of digital assets, other companies may from time to time reach different conclusions

from us on the security status of a particular digital asset. Although we anticipate that these differences will narrow over time, if competitors conclude that they can hold digital assets in ways that we do not permit, then they may have business and revenue opportunities that are not available to us.

If we were deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, applicable restrictions likely would make it impractical for us to continue segments of our business as currently contemplated.

The Investment Company Act is intended to protect investors (for example, by preventing insiders from managing investment companies to their benefit and to the detriment of public investors), and it requires an issuer primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities to register as an investment company, unless a valid exemption applies. Under Sections 3(a)(1)(A) and (C) of the Investment Company Act, a company generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” if (i) it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities or (ii) it engages or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities, and it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.

We do not believe that we are an “investment company” as such term is defined in either Section 3(a)(1)(A) or Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act since we believe HYPE is not an investment security. With respect to Section 3(a)(1)(A), we do not hold ourselves out as being engaged primarily or propose to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities within the meaning of such section. With respect to Section 3(a)(1)(C), we do not own or propose to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of our total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Our stockholders will not have the regulatory protections provided to investors in investment companies.

HYPE and other digital assets, as well as new business models and transactions enabled by blockchain technologies, present novel interpretive questions under the Investment Company Act. There is a risk that assets or arrangements that we have concluded are not securities could be deemed to be securities by the SEC or another authority for purposes of the Investment Company Act, which would increase the percentage of securities held by us for Investment Company Act purposes. The SEC has requested information from a number of participants in the digital assets’ ecosystem, regarding the potential application of the Investment Company Act to their businesses. For example, in an action unrelated to the Company, in February 2022, the SEC issued a cease-and-desist order under the Investment Company Act to BlockFi Lending LLC (“BlockFi”), in which the SEC alleged that BlockFi was operating as an unregistered investment company because it issued securities and also held more than 40% of its total assets, excluding cash, in investment securities, including the loans of digital assets made by BlockFi to institutional borrowers.

If we were deemed to be an investment company, Rule 3a-2 under the Investment Company Act is a safe harbor that provides a one-year grace period for transient investment companies that have a bona fide intent to be engaged primarily, as soon as is reasonably possible (in any event by the termination of such one-year period), in a business other than that of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities, with such intent evidenced by the company’s business activities and an appropriate resolution of its board of directors. The grace period is available not more than once every three years and runs from the earlier of (i) the date on which the issuer owns securities and/or cash having a value exceeding 50% of the issuer’s total assets on either a consolidated or unconsolidated basis or (ii) the date on which the issuer owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of such issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Accordingly, the grace period may not be available at the time that we seek to rely on Rule 3a-2; however, Rule 3a-2 is a safe harbor and we may rely on any exemption or exclusion from investment company status available to us under the Investment Company Act at any given time. Furthermore, maintaining our status as a non-investment company or reliance on Rule 3a-2 could require us to take actions to dispose of securities and/or acquire other assets, which dispositions or acquisitions could be required to take place under unfavorable market conditions and could result in the incurrence of losses, and could limit our ability to make certain investments or enter into joint ventures, or otherwise limit or change our service offerings and operations.

If we were to be deemed an investment company in the future, restrictions imposed by the Investment Company Act-including limitations on our ability to issue different classes of stock and equity compensation to

directors, officers, and employees and restrictions on management, operations, and transactions with affiliated persons-likely would make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated, and would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects. In addition, if we were to become subject to the Investment Company Act, any violation of the Investment Company Act could subject us to material adverse consequences, including potentially significant regulatory penalties and the possibility that certain of our contracts would be deemed unenforceable. In such event, there would be no guarantee that we would be able to take actions to modify our operations to cease to be an investment company or to bring our operations into compliance with the Investment Company Act. Furthermore, any steps we are able to take to ensure future compliance with the Investment Company Act would not insulate us from liability for past violations. Any of these events could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

HYPE is created and transmitted through the operations of the peer-to-peer Hyperliquid network, a decentralized network of computers running software following the HYPE protocol. If the Hyperliquid network is disrupted or encounters any unanticipated difficulties, the value of HYPE could be negatively impacted.

If the Hyperliquid network is disrupted or encounters any unanticipated difficulties, then the processing of transactions on the Hyperliquid network may be disrupted, which in turn may prevent us from depositing or withdrawing HYPE from our accounts with our custodian or otherwise effecting HYPE transactions. Such disruptions could include, for example: the price volatility of HYPE; the insolvency, business failure, interruption, default, failure to perform, security breach, or other problems of participants, custodians or others; the closing of HYPE trading platforms due to fraud, failures, security breaches or otherwise; or network outages or congestion, power outages, or other problems or disruptions affecting the Hyperliquid network. For example, on July 29, 2025, Hyperliquid’s API servers experienced a significant spike in traffic, leading to the delay of orders being sent to the nodes for approximately 37 minutes. Hyperliquid has since resolved the issue and provided refunds to affected traders. While there was no hack or exploit, and the blockchain was unaffected, other digital asset networks have experienced more serious disruptions. If the Hyperliquid network is disrupted or encounters other unanticipated difficulties, the value of HYPE could be negatively impacted, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

In addition, digital asset validating operations can consume significant amounts of electricity, which may have a negative environmental impact and give rise to public opinion against allowing, or government regulations restricting, the use of electricity for validating operations. Additionally, validators may be forced to cease operations during an electricity shortage or power outage.

We face risks relating to the custody of our HYPE, including the loss or destruction of private keys required to access our HYPE, cyberattacks or other data loss relating to our HYPE, including smart contract related losses and vulnerabilities, and potential conflicts of interest.

We currently hold substantially all of our HYPE with a regulated custodian, and we intend to continue to hold substantially all of our HYPE with one or more regulated custodians that have duties to safeguard our private keys. Our custodial services contracts will not restrict our ability to reallocate our HYPE among custodians, and our HYPE holdings may continue to be concentrated with a single custodian. Our HYPE is currently held by Anchorage, which is a qualified custodian as defined under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. While Anchorage is a federally regulated entity, we will remain exposed to various risks as a result of our reliance on one or more third-party custodians to manage and hold our HYPE. Because substantially all of the Company’s HYPE tokens are currently held with a single custodian, our ability to access the HYPE tokens is driven by the custodian’s ability to comply with contractual requirements. In light of the significant amount of HYPE we anticipate that we will hold, we expect to seek to engage additional custodians to achieve a greater degree of diversification in the custody of our HYPE as the extent of potential risk of loss is dependent, in part, on the degree of diversification. However, multiple custodians may not be available or may utilize similar wallet infrastructure, cloud service providers or software systems, which could increase systemic technology risk.

If there is a decrease in the availability of digital asset custodians that we believe can safely custody our HYPE, for example, due to regulatory developments or enforcement actions that cause custodians to discontinue or limit their services, we may need to enter into agreements that are less favorable or take other measures to custody our HYPE, and our ability to seek a greater degree of diversification in the use of custodial services would be

materially adversely affected. While we will conduct due diligence on our custodians and any smart contract platforms we may use, there can be no assurance that such diligence will uncover all risks, including operational deficiencies, hidden vulnerabilities or legal noncompliance.

Any insurance that may cover losses of our HYPE holdings may cover none or only a small fraction of the value of the entirety of our HYPE holdings, and there can be no guarantee that such insurance will be maintained as part of the custodial services we have or that such coverage will cover losses with respect to our HYPE. Furthermore, any such insurance that may be maintained by our custodians may be subject to aggregate limits and shared among all of such custodian’s customers, thereby reducing the coverage of losses with respect to our HYPE. In the event of a large-scale security incident, cyber-attack, or other loss event affecting multiple customers, the total claims could exceed the policy’s aggregate limit, leading to pro-rated or insufficient payouts that may not fully compensate us for our losses. Furthermore, these policies may exclude certain risks, such as losses from market volatility, smart contract failures, or internal errors, which may increase our exposure. As a result, inadequate or shared insurance could lead to significant unrecovered losses, materially adversely affecting the value of our treasury, our financial condition and results of operations.

Moreover, our use of custodians exposes us to the risk that the HYPE our custodians hold on our behalf could be subject to insolvency proceedings and we could be treated as a general unsecured creditor of the custodian, inhibiting our ability to exercise ownership rights with respect to such HYPE. Any loss associated with such insolvency proceedings is unlikely to be covered by any insurance coverage we may maintain related to our HYPE. The legal framework governing digital asset ownership and rights in custodial or insolvency contexts remains uncertain and continues to evolve, which could result in unexpected losses, protracted recovery processes or adverse treatment in insolvency proceedings.

HYPE is controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key(s) relating to the local or online digital wallet in which the HYPE is held. While the Layer 1 blockchain ledger requires a public key relating to a digital wallet to be published when used in a transaction, private keys must be safeguarded and kept private in order to prevent a third party from accessing the HYPE held in such wallet. To the extent the private key(s) for a digital wallet are lost, destroyed, or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private key(s) is accessible, neither we nor our custodians will be able to access the HYPE held in the related digital wallet. Furthermore, we cannot provide assurance that our digital wallets, nor the digital wallets of our custodians held on our behalf, will not be compromised as a result of a cyberattack. The HYPE and blockchain ledger, as well as other digital assets and blockchain technologies, have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks or other malicious activities.

As part of our treasury management strategy, we may engage in staking, restaking, validating or other permitted activities that involve the use of “smart contracts” or decentralized applications. The use of smart contracts or decentralized applications entails certain risks including risks stemming from the existence of an “admin key” or coding flaws that could be exploited, potentially allowing a bad actor to issue or otherwise compromise the smart contract or decentralized application, potentially leading to a loss of our HYPE. Like all software code, smart contracts are exposed to risk that the code contains a bug or other security vulnerability, which can lead to loss of assets that are held on or transacted through the contract or decentralized application. Smart contracts and decentralized applications may contain bugs, security vulnerabilities or poorly designed permission structures that could result in the irreversible loss of HYPE or other digital assets. Exploits, including those stemming from admin key misuse, admin key compromise, or protocol flaws, have occurred in the past and may occur in the future. Certain employees or vendors may also be vulnerable to physical or psychological coercion, commonly referred to as “wrench attacks,” as well as scams and social engineering tactics intended to obtain access to passwords or private cryptographic keys, in order to then effectuate the unauthorized transfer or theft of digital assets.

In addition, in certain cases our digital asset trading service providers may be affiliated with our custodians, which may give rise to conflicts of interest. For example, Anchorage also acts as one of the execution agents for our HYPE accumulation. Because the same provider both holds our digital assets in custody and executes our HYPE accumulation transactions, it may have less incentive to obtain best execution, the quality and pricing of our transactions may be less transparent, and the prices at which we acquire HYPE may be less favorable than they would be if custody and execution were performed by unaffiliated parties. Any of the foregoing could increase our acquisition costs and adversely affect our results of operations and the net asset value of our HYPE holdings.

Our business is subject to risks of loss from security breaches, hacks, and exploits affecting DeFi protocols and digital asset infrastructure.

The digital asset industry, including decentralized finance (“DeFi”) protocols and blockchain networks, has been, and will likely continue to be, targeted by malicious actors. In April 2026, two high-profile exploits highlighted these vulnerabilities. On April 1, 2026, Drift Protocol, a leading decentralized perpetuals exchange on Solana, was exploited for approximately $285 million through a months-long social engineering campaign that compromised the protocol’s administrative multi-signature controls and subsequently exploited oracle manipulation to drain assets using fictitious collateral. On April 18, 2026, Kelp DAO suffered a $292 million exploit involving its LayerZero-powered bridge, resulting in the theft of a significant portion of its rsETH supply and the propagation of losses across other blockchain networks. These incidents, among the largest DeFi exploits of 2026, demonstrate that even established protocols with substantial liquidity and user bases remain susceptible to sophisticated attacks involving smart contract vulnerabilities, cross-chain bridge exploits, social engineering, oracle manipulation, and compromised access controls.

The Company holds a material portion of its assets in HYPE tokens, which are staked on the Hyperliquid blockchain and held in custody with a qualified digital asset custodian. We also interact with custodians and third-party infrastructure as part of our treasury operations. Any security breach, exploit, or loss of assets on the Hyperliquid protocol or third-party services we rely on could result in the partial or total loss of our HYPE holdings, materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations, and cause a significant decline in the market price of our Common Stock. In addition, such events could erode market confidence in the broader digital asset ecosystem, reduce demand for HYPE, and lead to increased regulatory scrutiny of on-chain treasury strategies.

Although we implement various security measures, including multi-signature wallets and counterparty due diligence, there can be no assurance that these or future measures will be sufficient to prevent all losses from hacks, exploits, or other security incidents. The evolving nature of cyber threats, including increasingly sophisticated social engineering and cross-chain attacks, makes it difficult to fully anticipate or mitigate all risks.

We may be subject to risks arising from incidental rights to passively receive additional benefits or digital assets arising from our HYPE holdings during events such as airdrops, hard forks or similar events.

As a holder of HYPE, we may receive incidental rights to passively receive additional benefits or digital assets during events such as airdrops, hard forks or similar events. While these events can create value for the Company, such events may introduce risks, which could include security vulnerabilities, regulatory compliance issues, tax liabilities, and operational complexities. For example, airdrop events may cause increased levels of cyberattack, and in the event of a hard fork or similar blockchain event affecting the digital assets held in our treasury, such as the creation of a divergent chain, there is a risk that attacks, including replay attacks, could occur if the new chain does not implement adequate protection mechanisms. During an airdrop event, we will endeavor to ensure, and we expect that our custodian will endeavor to ensure, the legitimacy of the airdrop event through cross-checking of multiple sources, including official websites, and verify the accuracy of airdrop claim process details. Likewise, we will endeavor to evaluate and support only forks with robust security features, including replay protection. However, we cannot assure you that these efforts will be successful, in which case we could be exposed to significant financial losses, operational disruptions, liabilities and/or reputational harm.

Our historical financial statements do not reflect the potential variability in earnings that we may experience in the future relating to our HYPE holdings.

Because we only recently initiated our HYPE treasury strategy, our historical financial statements do not reflect the potential variability in earnings that we may experience in the future from holding or selling significant amounts of HYPE. The price of digital assets have historically been subject to dramatic price fluctuations and is highly volatile. In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2023-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU 2023-08”), which we have adopted.

ASU 2023-08 requires us to measure our HYPE holdings at fair value in our statement of financial position, and to recognize gains and losses from changes in the fair value of our HYPE in net income each reporting period.

ASU 2023-08 also requires us to provide certain interim and annual disclosures with respect to our HYPE holdings. As a result, volatility in our earnings may be significantly more than what we experienced in prior periods.

Unrealized fair value gains on our HYPE holdings could cause us to become subject to the corporate alternative minimum tax under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.

The United States enacted the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) in August 2022. Unless an exemption applies, the IRA imposes a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax (“CAMT”) on a corporation with respect to an initial tax year and subsequent tax years, if the average annual adjusted financial statement income for any consecutive three-tax-year period preceding the initial tax year exceeds $1 billion. On September 12, 2024, the Department of Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service issued proposed regulations with respect to the application of the CAMT.

In connection with the implementation of our HYPE treasury strategy, we have adopted ASU 2023-08. ASU 2023-08 requires us to measure our HYPE holdings at fair value in our statement of financial position, with gains and losses from changes in the fair value of our HYPE recognized in net income each reporting period. When determining whether we are subject to CAMT and when calculating any related tax liability for an applicable tax year, the proposed regulations provide that, among other adjustments, our adjusted financial statement income must include this ratable amount in addition to any unrealized gains or losses reported in the applicable tax year. In 2025, the IRS released IRS Notice 2025-49 which allows for the deferral of these mark-to-market adjustments in the calculation of CAMT. With that said, this release is interim guidance rather than proposed or final regulations.

Accordingly, as a result of the enactment of the IRA and our adoption of ASU 2023-08, while we have current relief under IRS Notice 2025-49, until final guidance is released there is uncertainty as to whether this notice will become law, and as such we could become subject to the CAMT in future tax years. If we become subject to the CAMT, it could result in a material tax obligation that we would need to satisfy in cash, which could materially affect our financial results, including our earnings and cash flow, and our financial condition.

Due to the unregulated nature and lack of transparency surrounding the operations of many HYPE trading venues, HYPE trading venues may experience greater fraud, security failures or regulatory or operational problems than trading venues for more established asset classes, which may result in a loss of confidence in HYPE trading venues and adversely affect the value of our HYPE.

HYPE trading venues are relatively new and, in many cases, unregulated. Furthermore, there are many HYPE trading venues which do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices and regulatory compliance. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in HYPE trading venues, including prominent exchanges that handle a significant volume of HYPE trading and/or are subject to regulatory oversight, in the event one or more HYPE trading venues cease or pause for a prolonged period the trading of HYPE or other digital assets, or experience fraud, significant volumes of withdrawal, security failures or operational problems.

“Front-running” poses a significant risk in digital asset markets, where traders or automated bots exploit advance knowledge of pending large transactions, such as through visibility into blockchain mempools or order books, to execute trades ahead of others, thereby profiting at the expense of other participants and leading to unfavorable execution prices or slippage. The SEC and Department of Justice have addressed front-running in cryptocurrency contexts, including cases involving bots that manipulate trading activity on decentralized finance protocols or exploit algorithmic vulnerabilities, which can distort market fairness and increase costs for large buyers. Furthermore, security failures and operational problems at HYPE trading venues represent material risks; these include hacks, exploits, system outages, or smart contract vulnerabilities that may lead to substantial losses.

The SEC alleged as part of its June 5, 2023, complaint against Binance that Binance committed strategic and targeted “wash trading” through its affiliates to artificially inflate the volume of certain digital assets traded on its exchange. The SEC has also brought actions against individuals and digital asset market participants alleging that such persons artificially increased trading volumes in certain digital assets through wash trades, or repeated buying and selling of the same assets in fictitious transactions to manipulate their underlying trading price. Such reports and allegations may indicate that the HYPE market is significantly smaller than expected and that the United States

makes up a significantly larger percentage of the HYPE market than is commonly understood. Any actual or perceived wash trading in the HYPE market, and any other fraudulent or manipulative acts and practices, could adversely affect the value of our HYPE.

Negative perception, a lack of stability in the broader digital currency markets and the closure, temporary shutdown or operational disruption of HYPE trading venues, lending institutions, institutional investors, institutional miners, custodians, or other major participants in the HYPE ecosystem, due to fraud, business failure, cybersecurity events, government-mandated regulation, bankruptcy, or for any other reason, may result in a decline in confidence in HYPE and the broader digital currency ecosystem and greater volatility in the price of HYPE. For example, in 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital, Three Arrows Capital, FTX, and BlockFi filed for bankruptcy, following which digital assets significantly declined. In addition, in June 2023, the SEC announced enforcement actions against Coinbase and Binance, two providers of large trading venues for digital assets, which similarly was followed by a decrease in the market price of digital assets. These were followed in November 2023, by an SEC enforcement action against Payward Inc. and Payward Ventures Inc., together known as Kraken, another large trading venue for digital assets. While the complaint against Coinbase was dismissed in February 2025, the complaint against Payward Inc. and Payward Ventures Inc. was dismissed with prejudice in March 2025, and the complaint against Binance was dismissed on May 29, 2025, the SEC or other regulatory agencies may initiate similar actions in the future. For example, in April 2025, the State of Oregon brought a civil enforcement action against Coinbase for allegedly selling unregistered securities. As the price of our listed securities may be affected by the value of our HYPE holdings, the failure of a major participant in the digital currency ecosystem could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our listed securities.

The concentration of our HYPE holdings could enhance the risks inherent in our HYPE treasury strategy.

The concentration of our HYPE holdings limits the risk mitigation that we could achieve if we were to purchase a more diversified portfolio of treasury assets, and the absence of diversification enhances the risks inherent in our HYPE treasury strategy. Any future significant declines in the price of HYPE would have a more pronounced impact on our financial condition than if we used our cash to purchase a more diverse portfolio of assets.

The emergence or growth of other blockchains and associated digital assets, including those with significant private or public sector backing, could have a negative impact on the price of HYPE and adversely affect our business.

As a result of our HYPE treasury strategy, our assets are concentrated in our HYPE holdings. Accordingly, the emergence or growth of digital assets other than HYPE may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. There are numerous alternative digital assets and many entities, including consortiums and financial institutions, are researching and investing resources into private or permissioned blockchains that do not use proof-of-stake consensus mechanism like the Hyperliquid network, or use different technical innovations that build upon or improve the proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. For example, in late 2022, the Ethereum network transitioned to a “proof-of-stake” mechanism for validating transactions that requires significantly less computing power than proof-of-work mining. The Ethereum network has completed another major upgrade since then and may undertake additional upgrades in the future. If improved mechanisms for validating transactions on blockchains are perceived as superior to proof-of-stake, those digital assets could gain market share relative to HYPE.

Mathematical or technological advances, such as the development of quantum computers, could undermine the cryptographic algorithms that secure the Hyperliquid blockchain.

The Hyperliquid blockchain relies on cryptographic algorithms for address generation, transaction verification, and smart contract execution. Advances in quantum computing — for example, Microsoft’s February 2025 announcement of its Majorana 1 topological qubit chip — could eventually render certain current cryptographic methods vulnerable. While quantum computing capable of breaking widely used algorithms remains speculative and is generally expected to be years away, any such breakthrough could compromise the security of the Hyperliquid blockchain, allow unauthorized access to wallets holding HYPE, or otherwise impair normal operations.

Although various participants in the ecosystem are actively exploring and implementing quantum-resistant cryptographic solutions, there is no assurance that such upgrades will be developed, adopted, or implemented successfully or in a timely manner across the network. Any transition would likely require broad community consensus and could involve one or more blockchain forks. Failure to achieve consensus or to implement effective quantum-resistant measures could result in a loss of confidence in the Hyperliquid blockchain, reduced demand for HYPE, and adverse effects on the value of the Company Common Stock. Moreover, any perceived weakness in the cryptography underlying digital assets more broadly could negatively affect the market for HYPE and, in turn, the trading price of the Company Common Stock.

Proof-of-stake blockchains are a relatively recent innovation, and have not been subject to as widespread use or adoption over as long of a period of time as traditional proof-of-work blockchains.

Certain digital assets, such as Bitcoin, use a “proof-of-work” consensus algorithm. The genesis block on the Bitcoin blockchain was mined in 2009, and Bitcoin’s blockchain has been in operation since then. Many newer blockchains enabling smart contract functionality use a newer consensus algorithm known as “proof-of-stake.” While their proponents believe that they may have certain advantages, the “proof-of-stake” consensus mechanisms and governance systems underlying many newer blockchain protocols, including the Hyperliquid network, and their associated digital assets-including our HYPE holdings-have not been tested at scale over as long of a period of time or subject to as widespread use or adoption as, for example, Bitcoin’s proof-of-work consensus mechanism has. This could lead to these blockchains, and their associated digital assets, having undetected vulnerabilities, structural design flaws, suboptimal incentive structures for network participants (e.g., validators), technical disruptions, or a wide variety of other problems, any of which could cause these blockchains not to function as intended, lead to outright failure to function entirely causing a total outage or disruption of network activity, or to suffer other operational problems or reputational damage, leading to a loss of users or adoption or a loss in value of the associated digital assets, including our HYPE holdings. Over the long term, there can be no assurance that the proof-of-stake blockchain on which our HYPE holdings rely will achieve widespread scale or adoption or perform successfully; any failure to do so could negatively impact the price of HYPE and the value of our HYPE holdings.

The SEC may approve applications under Rule 19b-4 of the Exchange Act to list competing digital assets as exchange-traded products, which could reduce demand for, and the price of, HYPE and adversely impact the value of our HYPE holdings.

To date, the SEC has only approved applications under Rule 19b-4 of the Exchange Act to list spot digital asset exchange-traded products which hold Bitcoin, Ether and Solana. However, applications for competing digital assets have been filed and are currently pending, and there can be no guarantee the SEC will not one day approve any such application. If applications to list spot digital asset exchange-traded products, other than those which hold HYPE, are approved, to the extent such competing digital asset exchange-traded products come to represent a significant proportion of the demand for digital assets generally, demand for, and the price of, HYPE could be reduced.

Competition from the emergence or growth of other digital assets could have a negative impact on the price of HYPE and adversely affect the value of our HYPE holdings.

The digital asset market is highly competitive and rapidly evolving, with numerous alternative cryptocurrencies, blockchains, and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms vying for market share in areas such as perpetual futures trading, staking, and on-chain liquidity provision, which are core to the Hyperliquid ecosystem and its HYPE token. As of August 23, 2026, HYPE was the seventh largest network token by market capitalization, as tracked by Messari, based on circulating market capitalization. As of August 23, 2026, digital assets tracked by CoinMarketCap.com had a total market capitalization of approximately $2.6 trillion (including the approximately $19.6 billion market cap of HYPE, based on circulating market capitalization), as calculated using market prices and total available supply of each digital asset. HYPE faces competition from a wide range of digital assets, including Bitcoin and Ether. Existing or emerging competitors could attract users and developers away from the Hyperliquid ecosystem by providing superior technology, lower fees, faster transaction speeds or broader ecosystem integrations, potentially eroding Hyperliquid’s market position and leading to reduced trading volumes, staking participation, and overall demand. Many consortiums and financial institutions are also researching and investing resources into private or permissioned blockchain platforms rather than open platforms like the Hyperliquid network. As 99% of

Hyperliquid’s revenues are currently allocated to the Assistance Fund for the repurchase of HYPE tokens, a decline in revenue could have a material impact on the demand for HYPE tokens. In addition, HYPE is supported by fewer trading platforms than more established digital assets, such as Bitcoin and Ether, which could impact its liquidity. In addition, the Hyperliquid network is in direct competition with other smart contract platforms, such as the Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Avalanche and Cardano networks. Competition from the emergence or growth of alternative digital assets or other smart contract platforms could have a negative impact on the demand for, and price of, HYPE, and thereby adversely affect the value of our HYPE holdings.

Investors may also invest in HYPE through means other than our securities, including through direct investments in HYPE and other financial vehicles, including securities backed by or linked to HYPE and digital asset treasury companies similar to us. Market and financial conditions, and other conditions beyond our control, may make it more attractive to gain exposure to HYPE through other vehicles, rather than our securities.

Commencement of vesting a large number of HYPE tokens in November 2025 may cause increased price volatility and downward price pressure on the HYPE token.

Commencing in November 2025, approximately 238 million HYPE tokens (representing 23.8% of the total current supply) allocated to core contributors began vesting on a monthly basis following a one-year lockup period after the Token Generation Event on November 29, 2024. Specific information on the amounts that will be vested and unlocked on a monthly basis, and the duration of the vesting and unlocking period, is not known to us. The vesting and unlocking of substantial HYPE tokens may introduce significant additional HYPE token supply into the market, which in turn may lead to increased selling pressure as unlocked HYPE tokens become available for transfer or sale by recipients, resulting in heightened price volatility, downward pressure on the HYPE token’s market value, reduced liquidity, or dilution of our treasury holdings’ proportional ownership of HYPE tokens. If core contributors or their affiliates dispose of substantial amounts of vested HYPE tokens in a short period, particularly during periods of market instability or low trading volume, it could exacerbate these effects, materially adversely impacting the value of our HYPE token assets, our financial condition, and the value of our securities.

Competition from central bank digital currencies and emerging payments initiatives involving financial institutions could adversely affect the price of HYPE and other digital assets.

Central banks in various countries have introduced digital forms of legal tender (“CBDCs”). China’s CBDC project, known as Digital Currency Electronic Payment, has reportedly been tested in a live pilot program conducted in multiple cities in China. Central banks representing at least 130 countries have published retail or wholesale CBDC work ranging from research to pilot projects. Whether or not they incorporate blockchain or similar technology, CBDCs, as legal tender in the issuing jurisdiction, could have an advantage in competing with, or replace, HYPE and other cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange or store of value. Central banks and other governmental entities have also announced cooperative initiatives and consortia with private sector entities, with the goal of leveraging blockchain and other technology to reduce friction in cross-border and interbank payments and settlement, and commercial banks and other financial institutions have also recently announced a number of initiatives of their own to incorporate new technologies, including blockchain and similar technologies, into their payments and settlement activities, which could compete with, or reduce the demand for, HYPE. As a result of any of the foregoing factors, the price of HYPE could decrease, which could adversely affect the value of our HYPE holdings.

Our HYPE holdings will be less liquid than our cash and cash equivalents and may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents.

Historically, the cryptocurrency market has been characterized by significant volatility in price, limited liquidity and trading volumes compared to sovereign currencies markets, relative anonymity, a developing regulatory landscape, potential susceptibility to market abuse and manipulation, compliance and internal control failures at exchanges, and various other risks inherent in its entirely electronic, virtual form and decentralized network. During times of market instability, we may not be able to sell our HYPE at favorable prices or at all. As a result, our HYPE holdings may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents.

Further, the HYPE we hold with our custodian or custodians and transact with our trade execution partners does not enjoy the same protections as are available to cash or securities deposited with or transacted by institutions subject to regulation by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.

Additionally, we may be unable to enter into term loans or other capital raising transactions collateralized by our unencumbered HYPE or otherwise generate funds using our HYPE holdings, including in particular during times of market instability or when the price of HYPE has declined significantly. If we are unable to sell our HYPE, enter into additional capital raising transactions, including capital raising transactions using HYPE as collateral, or otherwise generate funds using our HYPE holdings, or if we are forced to sell our HYPE at a significant loss, in order to meet our working capital requirements, our business and financial condition could be negatively impacted.

Risks Associated with Staking HYPE.

Our staking of HYPE involves inherent risks, including:

Our staking program for HYPE tokens involves delegating to third-party validators on the Hyperliquid network, which exposes us to risks from on-chain penalty mechanisms that could result in lost rewards or, in severe cases, permanent token losses. Currently, automatic on-chain slashing is not implemented for standard staking activities in the Hyperliquid network, but penalties are enforced through a jailing system where validators failing to meet latency or response frequency requirements may be temporarily excluded from consensus participation upon a quorum of peer votes, preventing reward generation for delegators like us and imposing an opportunity cost through forgone yield. Slashing is reserved for malicious actions such as double-signing blocks. There is no information publicly available in relation to Hyperliquid network penalty percentages, triggers, or recovery processes.

Our staked HYPE holdings are subject to a 7-day unstaking queue, which allows time for social interventions or additional penalties, while jailed validators can unjail after remediation subject to rate limits, but without any mechanism to recover lost rewards. These factors could lead to reduced staking yields, temporary illiquidity, or material financial impacts if our selected validators underperform or engage in misconduct, adversely affecting the overall value of our treasury holdings and our ability to generate expected income from staking activities. As of

August 23, 2026, based on publicly available information, there have not been any incidents of slashing within the Hyperliquid network.

The Company does not guarantee any specific staking rewards or benefits from staking HYPE, and past performance is not indicative of future results.

If the Company or its third-party service providers experience a security breach or cyberattack and unauthorized parties obtain access to its HYPE, or if the Company’s private keys are lost or destroyed, or other similar circumstances or events occur, the Company may lose some or all of its HYPE and its financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Substantially all of the HYPE the Company owns is held in custody accounts at a U.S.-based institutional-grade digital asset custodian. Security breaches and cyberattacks are of particular concern with respect to the Company’s HYPE. While we are not aware of any security breaches to the HYPE network, other blockchain-based cryptocurrencies and the entities that provide services to participants in the HYPE ecosystem have been, and the HYPE network may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activities. For example, in October 2021 it was reported that hackers exploited a flaw in the account recovery process and stole from the accounts of at least 6,000 customers of the Coinbase exchange, although the flaw was subsequently fixed and Coinbase reimbursed affected customers. Similarly, in November 2022, hackers exploited weaknesses in the security architecture of the FTX Trading digital asset exchange and reportedly stole over $400 million in digital assets from customers. In February 2025, approximately $1.5 billion of ether was stolen from the Dubai-based Bybit exchange. Bybit claims the hack occurred when the company was making a routine transfer of ether from an offline “cold” wallet to a hot wallet, with attacker suspected to be agents of North Korea exploiting security controls to gain control of the assets.

A successful security breach or cyberattack could result in:

Further, any actual or perceived data security breach or cybersecurity attack directed at other companies with digital assets or companies that operate digital asset networks, regardless of whether the Company is directly impacted, could lead to a general loss of confidence in the broader HYPE ecosystem or in the use of the HYPE network to conduct financial transactions, which could negatively impact the Company.

Attacks upon systems across a variety of industries, including industries related to HYPE, are increasing in frequency, persistence, and sophistication, and, in many cases, are being conducted by sophisticated, well-funded and organized groups and individuals, including state actors. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized, improper or illegal access to systems and information (including personal data and digital assets), disable or degrade services, or sabotage systems are constantly evolving, may be difficult to detect quickly, and often are not recognized or detected until after they have been launched against a target. These attacks may occur on our systems or those of our third-party service providers or partners. the Company may experience breaches of our security measures due to human error, malfeasance, insider threats, system errors or vulnerabilities or other irregularities. In particular, we expect that unauthorized parties will attempt to gain access to the Company’s systems and facilities, as well as those of its partners and third-party service providers, through various means, such as hacking, social engineering, phishing and fraud. Threats can come from a variety of sources, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, and insiders. In addition, certain types of attacks could harm the Company even if its systems are left undisturbed. For example, certain threats are designed to remain dormant or undetectable, sometimes for extended periods of time, or until launched against a target and the Company may not be able to implement adequate preventative measures. Further, there has been an increase in such activities due to

the increase in work-from-home arrangements. The risk of cyberattacks could also be increased by cyberwarfare in connection with the ongoing Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Hamas conflicts, or other future conflicts, including potential proliferation of malware into systems unrelated to such conflicts. Any future breach of the Company’s operations or those of others in the HYPE industry, including third-party services on which the Company relies, could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company will continue to incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company and its management team will be required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives.

As a public company, the Company is incurring, and will continue to incur, significant legal, accounting and other expenses that Rorschach did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and Nasdaq have imposed various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and internal control over financial reporting and corporate governance practices. The Company’s management and other personnel are required to devote time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations increase the Company’s legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

The Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, which requires, among other things, that the Company file with the SEC annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to the Company’s business and financial condition as well as other disclosure and corporate governance requirements. If the Company is not able to comply with the requirements in a timely manner or at all, the Company’s financial condition or the market price of the Company Common Stock may be harmed.

Among other things, the Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s compliance with these requirements will require that it incur substantial accounting and related expenses and expend significant management efforts. the Company may need to hire additional accounting and financial staff to comply with public company regulations. The costs of hiring such staff may be material and there can be no assurance that such staff will be immediately available to the Company.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Company will be required to furnish a report by its management on its internal control over financial reporting, which may include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by its independent registered public accounting firm. To the extent that the Company remains a “smaller reporting company”, it will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by its independent registered public accounting firm. The Company will need to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants, maintain a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. Despite such efforts, there is a risk that neither it nor its independent registered public accounting firm, if required, will be able to conclude that its internal control over financial reporting remains effective as required by Section 404. This could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of the Company’s financial statements.

Moreover, if the Company identifies deficiencies in its internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or if the Company cannot provide reliable financial reports, prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company, investors could lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of the Company’s financial reports, its reputation and operating results may be harmed, the market price of the Company Common Stock could decline and the Company could be subject to sanctions or investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC or other regulatory authorities.

There may be limitations on the effectiveness of our internal controls, and a failure of our control systems to prevent error or fraud may materially harm our company.

We are required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to furnish a report by our management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial

reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable and timely financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to reasonably detect and prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Undetected material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting could lead to financial statement restatements and require us to incur the expense of remediation.

Moreover, we do not expect that disclosure controls or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Failure of our control systems to detect or prevent error or fraud could materially adversely impact us.

Any of the foregoing occurrences, should they come to pass, could negatively impact the public perception of our company, which could have a negative impact on our stock price.

The loss of, or inability to maintain or establish, banking relationships could adversely affect our business and our ability to execute our HYPE treasury strategy.

Our ability to operate as a digital asset treasury company depends on access to banking services, including deposit accounts, wire transfer facilities, and other financial services necessary to fund HYPE purchases, pay operating expenses, service any indebtedness, and conduct day-to-day business operations. Financial institutions may be reluctant to provide banking services to companies whose primary assets consist of or whose business is closely associated with digital assets, including HYPE, due to regulatory uncertainty, reputational concerns, guidance from bank regulators, or internal risk management policies.

The digital asset industry has experienced significant disruptions in banking access in recent years. In March 2023, Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank — two of the primary banking partners for the digital asset industry — each failed and were placed into receivership. The closures significantly disrupted payment and settlement infrastructure for many digital asset businesses and their counterparties. While alternative banking relationships have since developed, there can be no assurance that these relationships will remain available to us or will not be similarly disrupted in the future.

If we are unable to establish or maintain banking relationships, or if our banking partners impose restrictions on our ability to transact, we may be unable to:

Any such disruption could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and our ability to continue our business as currently contemplated. In addition, the banking system has limited exposure to digital assets, and the failure of any financial institutions on which we rely — or any bank that serves as a counterparty or settlement institution to our custodians or trading partners — could also have an adverse effect on our business, even if we are not a direct customer of the affected institution. There can be no assurance that we will

be able to identify or transition to alternative banking providers in a timely manner or on commercially acceptable terms in such circumstances.

The governance structure of the Hyperliquid Network is concentrated, and protocol changes could be adopted without broad consensus, potentially adversely affecting the value of HYPE and our treasury holdings.

The Hyperliquid Network is governed through a protocol upgrade mechanism known as the Hyperliquid Improvement Proposal (“HIP”) process. Under this framework, community members may propose changes to the Hyperliquid protocol through off-chain community forums, and such proposals are listed in the Hyperliquid GitBook HIP repository. Protocol changes are ultimately determined by validator votes, with the voting weight of each validator determined by the amount of HYPE staked with that validator. A proposal must obtain the support of at least two-thirds of total staked HYPE to pass.

This governance structure presents a number of material risks to us as holders of HYPE:

The Hyperliquid Network’s HyperBFT consensus mechanism is subject to specific attack vectors that could disrupt transaction finality or compromise the integrity of the blockchain, potentially resulting in the loss of or inability to access our HYPE holdings.

The Hyperliquid Network uses a consensus algorithm known as HyperBFT, a variant of Byzantine Fault Tolerant (“BFT”) consensus that differs materially from the proof-of-work mechanism used by the Bitcoin network.

Unlike proof-of-work systems, which are vulnerable to so-called “51% attacks” requiring control of a majority of hash rate, the Hyperliquid Network’s BFT-based consensus mechanism has distinct and specific attack thresholds:

The failure or de-pegging of major stablecoins, particularly USDC, could disrupt Hyperliquid’s trading operations and cause a significant decline in the price of HYPE, adversely affecting the value of our treasury holdings.

The Hyperliquid perpetual futures trading platform relies primarily on USDC as the margin and settlement currency for open trading positions. USDC is a U.S. dollar-denominated stablecoin issued by Circle Internet Financial, LLC and is intended to maintain a 1:1 peg to the U.S. dollar through the holding of reserve assets. A significant portion of Hyperliquid’s total value locked, open interest, and daily trading activity is denominated in USDC.

The stability of USDC — and stablecoins generally — is subject to a number of risks, any of which could cause USDC to trade below its stated $1.00 peg (a so-called “de-peg”) or to become temporarily or permanently unavailable:

More broadly, a stablecoin crisis — regardless of whether USDC is directly implicated — could cause severe contagion across the digital asset markets, as demonstrated by the collapse of the TerraUSD (“UST”) algorithmic stablecoin in May 2022, which triggered a significant decline in the prices of most major digital assets, including assets that had no direct exposure to UST. Any such contagion could disproportionately affect HYPE, which has a smaller market capitalization and lower liquidity than Bitcoin or Ether, and could materially adversely affect the value of our treasury holdings and the market price of the Company Common Stock.

State-sponsored cyberattacks, including those attributed to North Korean threat actors, pose a heightened and specific threat to our HYPE holdings and our digital asset custodian, and any involvement of sanctioned entities in our HYPE transactions — even unknowingly — could expose us to OFAC enforcement action.

The digital asset industry is subject to a disproportionate level of cyberattack activity from sophisticated state-sponsored threat actors. In particular, the Lazarus Group and related organizations associated with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (“DPRK” or “North Korea”) have been responsible for a series of the largest and most technically sophisticated digital asset thefts in history. In February 2025, DPRK-affiliated hackers were attributed responsibility for the theft of approximately $1.5 billion in ether from the Dubai-based Bybit exchange — one of the largest digital asset thefts ever recorded. Prior notable incidents attributed to DPRK actors include the theft of approximately $625 million from the Ronin Network (Axie Infinity) in March 2022 and approximately $100 million from Harmony’s Horizon Bridge in June 2022.

These attacks pose a specific and heightened risk to the Company for two distinct but related reasons:

If any of our HYPE is determined to have passed through a sanctioned address, we could be subject to:

Any OFAC enforcement action against us, our custodian, or our counterparties could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and the market price of the Company Common Stock.

The patchwork of state money transmission laws and digital asset licensing requirements, including New York’s BitLicense regime, may impose compliance burdens on us or restrict our ability to conduct our HYPE treasury strategy in certain jurisdictions.

In addition to federal regulatory requirements, our HYPE treasury strategy may be subject to a complex and evolving patchwork of state-level laws governing money transmission and digital asset activities. The regulatory treatment of digital asset businesses under state law varies substantially across jurisdictions and may require us to obtain licenses or registrations before conducting certain HYPE-related activities.

The U.S. federal income tax treatment of our HYPE staking rewards is uncertain and evolving, and we could face material and unexpected tax liabilities as a result of staking activities, including ordinary income recognition at the time staking rewards are received.

We may engage in staking of our HYPE holdings, which involves delegating HYPE to validators on the Hyperliquid Network in exchange for staking rewards. The U.S. federal income tax treatment of staking rewards is subject to significant uncertainty:

Risks Related to the Company’s Securities

The trading price and volume of the Company may be volatile.

The trading price and volume of the Company Common Stock may be volatile. The stock markets in general have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of the Company Common Stock. Many factors may impair the market for the Company Common Stock and the ability of investors to sell shares at an attractive price and could also cause the market price and demand for the Company Common Stock to fluctuate substantially, which may negatively affect the price and liquidity of the Company Common Stock. Many of these factors and conditions are beyond the control of the Company or the Company stockholders.

The Company stockholders may experience additional dilution in the future due to any exercise of existing warrants and any future issuances of equity securities in the Company.

The percentage ownership of the Company stockholders may be diluted in the future because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or otherwise, including, without limitation, equity awards that the Company may grant to its directors, officers and employees. Such issuances may have a dilutive effect on the Company’s earnings per share, which could adversely affect the market price of the Company Common Stock.

It is expected that, from time to time, the Company Board will grant additional equity awards to employees and directors of the Company under the Company’s compensation and employee benefit plans. These additional equity awards will have a dilutive effect on the Company’s earnings per share, which could adversely affect the market price of the Company Common Stock.

In addition, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “Company Charter”) authorizes the Company to issue, without the approval of stockholders, one or more classes or series of preferred stock having such designations, powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special rights, including preferences over the Company Common Stock with respect to dividends and distributions, as the Company Board generally may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of the Company Common Stock. For example, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences that could be assigned to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the Company Common Stock.

The market price for the Common Stock of the Company may be affected by factors different from those that historically have affected or currently affect the Sonnet Common Stock.

The market price of the Company Common Stock may be influenced by a variety of factors that differ from those that have historically impacted or currently impact the Sonnet Common Stock. The business operations, financial condition, and prospects of the Company may differ significantly from those of Sonnet, and investors should be aware that the risks and uncertainties associated with the Company may not be the same as those previously associated with Sonnet.

In addition, the Company may be subject to new or additional risks as a result of the Transactions, including integration challenges, changes in management or business strategy, and exposure to new markets or regulatory environments. These factors, among others, could result in increased volatility or changes in the market price of the Company Common Stock that may not have been present with the Sonnet Common Stock prior to the Transactions.

Furthermore, the market’s perception of the Company, its growth prospects, and its ability to achieve anticipated synergies or financial results may also impact the trading price of the Company Common Stock. As a result, the market price of the Company Common Stock may fluctuate significantly and may be affected by factors unrelated to the historical performance of Sonnet Common Stock, which could adversely affect the value of your investment.

The price of the Company Common Stock may be volatile and fluctuate substantially, which could result in substantial losses for holders of the Company Common Stock.

The stock market in general has experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. With the adoption of the new HYPE treasury strategy, we expect to see additional volatility. As a result of this volatility, you may not be able to sell the Company Common Stock. The market price for the Company Common Stock may be influenced by many factors, including:

The Company management may invest or otherwise use the proceeds of any offering in ways with which you may not agree or in ways that may not yield a return.

The Company’s management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from any offering, including upon the exercise of the Advisor Warrants, and could use the proceeds in ways that do not improve its results of operations or enhance the value of the Company Common Stock. The failure by the Company’s management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could cause the price of the Company Common Stock to decline and delay the development of additional products and services in pursuit of its new HYPE strategy. Pending its use, the Company may invest the net proceeds in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.

Future sales and issuances of the Company Common Stock or rights to purchase common stock, including by the exercise of the Advisor Warrants for Advisor Warrant Shares, and pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan, could result in dilution and could cause the Company Common Stock price to fall.

Additional capital will be needed in the future to continue the Company’s planned operations. To the extent the Company raises additional capital by issuing equity securities, its stockholders may experience substantial dilution and some or all of the Company’s financial measures on a per share basis could be reduced. The Company may sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner it determines from time to time. If the Company sells common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in more than one transaction, investors may be materially diluted by subsequent sales. These sales may also result in material dilution to the Company’s existing stockholders and new investors could gain rights superior to existing stockholders. Moreover, as the Company’s intention to issue additional equity securities becomes publicly known, the Company’s share price may be materially adversely affected.

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreements, the Company has issued 27,394,800 Advisor Warrants. The Advisor Warrants are exercisable for five years following the Closing, at an exercise price equal to (i) for one-third of the Advisor Warrants, $9.375, (ii) for one-third of the Advisor Warrants, $12.50 and (iii) for one-third of the Advisor Warrants, $18.75. We cannot predict when and if the Advisor Warrants may be exercised for the Advisor Warrant Shares. To the extent such Advisor Warrants are exercised, additional shares of the Company Common Stock will be issued, which will result in dilution to the holders of the Company Common Stock and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market.

In addition, pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan of the Company, the Company Board is authorized to grant stock options and other equity-based awards to its employees, directors and consultants, which equity-based awards would also cause dilution to its stockholders. If the Company Board elects to increase the number of shares available for future grant by the maximum amount each year, stockholders may experience additional dilution, which could cause the Company Common Stock to fall.

Failure by the Company to comply with the continued listing standards of Nasdaq could result in a delisting of the Company Common Stock.

If the Company fails to satisfy the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq, such as the corporate governance requirements or the minimum closing bid price requirement, Nasdaq may take steps to delist the Company Common Stock. Such a delisting would likely have a negative effect on the price of the Company Common Stock and would impair your ability to sell or purchase the Company Common Stock when you wish to do so. In the event of a delisting, the Company can provide no assurance that any action taken by the Company to restore compliance with listing requirements would allow the Company Common Stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of the Company Common Stock, prevent the Company Common Stock from dropping below the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements. Upon a potential delisting from Nasdaq, if the Company Common Stock is not then eligible for quotation on another market or exchange, trading of the shares could be conducted in the over-the-counter market or on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities such as the Pink Sheets or the OTC Bulletin Board. In such event, it is likely that there would be significantly less liquidity in the trading of the Company Common Stock, decreases in institutional and other investor demand for the shares, coverage by securities analysts, market making activity and information available concerning trading prices and volume and fewer broker dealers willing to execute trades in the

Company Common Stock. Also, it may be difficult for the Company to raise additional capital if the Company Common Stock is not listed on a major exchange. The occurrence of any of these events could result in a further decline in the market price of the Company Common Stock and could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company is not expected to pay dividends on the Company Common Stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation, if any, in the price of the common stock.

The Company has never declared or made any cash distribution to its equity holders. The expectation is that the Company will retain future earnings for the development, operation and expansion of the Company’s business and it does not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. There is no guarantee that shares of the Company Common Stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which stockholders have purchased their shares.

If equity research analysts do not publish research or reports or publish unfavorable research or reports, about the Company, its business or its market, its stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for the Company Common Stock will be influenced by the research and reports that equity research analysts publish about it and its business. The Company does not have any control over the analysts or the content and opinions included in their research reports. The price of the Company Common Stock could decline if one or more equity research analysts downgrade the stock or issue other unfavorable commentary or research. If one or more equity research analysts cease coverage of the Company or fail to publish reports on it regularly, demand for its Common Stock could decrease, which in turn could cause the Company Common Stock price or trading volume to decline.

The Company is not subject to legal and regulatory obligations that apply to investment companies such as mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, or to obligations applicable to investment advisers.

Mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and their directors and management are subject to extensive regulation as “investment companies” and “investment advisers” under U.S. federal and state law; this regulation is intended for the benefit and protection of investors. The Company is not currently subject to, and does not otherwise voluntarily comply with these laws and regulations. This means, among other things, that the execution of or changes to the Company’s HYPE strategy, its use of leverage, the manner in which its HYPE is custodied, its ability to engage in transactions with affiliated parties and its operating and investment activities generally are not subject to the extensive legal and regulatory requirements and prohibitions that apply to investment companies and investment advisers. For example, although a significant change to the Company’s treasury reserve policy would require the approval of the Company’s board of directors, no stockholder or regulatory approval would be necessary. Consequently, the Company’s board of directors has broad discretion over the investment, leverage and cash management policies it authorizes, whether in respect of its HYPE holdings or other activities the Company may pursue, and has the power to change its current policies, including the Company’s strategy of acquiring and holding HYPE.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity.

Like many companies, we face significant and persistent cybersecurity risks. The small size of our organization and limited resources could exacerbate these risks. Our business strategy, results of operations, and financial condition have not, to date, been materially affected by risks from cybersecurity threats. During the reporting period, we have not experienced any material cyber incidents, nor have we experienced a series of immaterial incidents, which would require disclosure.

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data. To effectively prevent, detect, and respond to cybersecurity threats, we maintain a cyber risk management strategy, which is comprised of a wide array

of policies, standards, architecture, processes, and governance. This strategy focuses on safeguarding the Company's digital assets and the cryptographic keys and systems that control them, protecting the Company's information systems and corporate data and securing all material non-public information. The Company assesses these risks when evaluating not only its own controls and processes but also when choosing various custodians, partners or vendors. Under the guidance and supervision of our Chief Executive Officer, we further limit risk by delegating certain aspects of our information technology and cybersecurity to a third-party IT consultant to safeguard our networks. Additionally, we store our data with reputable third-party cloud service providers that maintain their own security controls.

Despite being a small organization, we are committed to maintaining governance and oversight of these risks and to implementing standard operating procedures (“SOPs”) and training to help us assess, identify, monitor and respond to these risks. Employees are trained to avoid phishing emails, and our internal controls system is designed to mitigate the risk of fraudulent payments or unauthorized cryptocurrency transfers.

Governance

We aim to incorporate industry best practices for companies of our size and financial strength throughout our cybersecurity program. Our Company Board has ultimate oversight of cybersecurity risk. The Chief Executive Officer reports to the Company Board. Our Chief Executive Officer provides periodic updates to the Company Board on (1) any critical cybersecurity risks; (2) ongoing cybersecurity initiatives and strategies; (3) applicable regulatory requirements; and (4) industry standards. The Chief Executive Officer also notifies the Company Board of any cybersecurity incidents (suspected or actual) and provides updates on the incidents as well as cybersecurity risk mitigation activities as appropriate.

Item 2. Properties.

The Company maintains its principal executive offices at 477 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10022. Our facilities, which are leased, are adequate to meet our current needs.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. Currently, we are not a party to any material legal proceedings or subject to any material claims.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our Common Stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “PURR”.

Holders

As of August 23, 2026, there were 197,837,597 shares of Common Stock outstanding held of record by approximately 57 holders. Because many of the shares of our Common Stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock to date. It is the present intention of the Company Board to retain all earnings, if any, for use in our business operations and, accordingly, the Company Board does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On December 5, 2025, the Company Board authorized a share repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”) under which the Company may repurchase up to $30 million of its Common Stock over a twelve-month period commencing December 5, 2025. Under the Repurchase Program, shares of Common Stock may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws. The actual timing, number and value of shares repurchased under the Repurchase Program will be determined by management at its discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of the Common Stock, general market and economic conditions and applicable legal requirements. There is no guarantee as to the number of shares that will be repurchased, and the Repurchase Program may be extended, suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice at the Company’s discretion.

The Company did not make any purchases of our common stock during the period from March 31, 2026 through June 30, 2026.

Item 6. [Reserved]

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis is based on, and should be read in conjunction with our financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2026 and for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains statements that are forward-looking. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risk, uncertainties and other factors. See the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed in “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Annual Report, and other factors that we have not identified.

Overview

We are a Delaware corporation and U.S. publicly listed digital asset treasury company. Our primary business is accumulating HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid Layer-1 blockchain ecosystem, on behalf of our stockholders. We believe Hyperliquid has established a significant and growing on-chain revenue base and that HYPE offers a long-term value proposition for our stockholders.

Our primary focus is building, managing, and optimizing our treasury with HYPE tokens, which are the native digital assets of the Hyperliquid Layer-1 blockchain. Our core operations include accumulating our long-term HYPE position and staking HYPE tokens, which we expect will generate ongoing staking rewards. While staking remains our central focus, secondary initiatives may include decentralized finance (DeFi) activities within the ecosystem to enhance long-term growth and income generation. Our aim is to provide capital-efficient and productive access to the HYPE token for U.S. and institutional investors, generating stockholder returns that individual holders may not be able to replicate through staking, yield optimization, and active ecosystem engagement.

Reverse Recapitalization and Sonnet Acquisition

On July 11, 2025, Sonnet, the Company, Rorschach, Sonnet Merger Sub Inc., and Rorschach Merger Sub LLC entered into the Transaction Agreement, pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Transaction Agreement, (i) Rorschach Merger Sub LLC would merge with and into Rorschach with Rorschach surviving the merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and (ii) immediately following the Rorschach Merger, Sonnet Merger Sub Inc. would merge with and into Sonnet, with Sonnet surviving the merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

On December 2, 2025, the Closing of the Transaction contemplated by the Transaction Agreement was completed. The combination of Rorschach and HSI was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization (the “Reverse Recapitalization”), with Rorschach surviving as the accounting acquirer. Under the Reverse Recapitalization, our assets and liabilities were recorded at historical cost. No goodwill or intangible assets were recognized. Consequently, our consolidated financial statements reflect the operations of Rorschach for accounting purposes, and together with the financial position and results of operations of HSI and Sonnet subsequent to the Closing Date.

Concurrently with the execution of the Transaction Agreement, (i) certain accredited investors entered into subscription agreements with us and Sonnet, pursuant to which Sonnet agreed to issue, and the subscribers agreed to purchase, immediately prior to the Closing, shares of Sonnet common stock, pursuant to a private placement in accordance with Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act (the “Closing PIPE”) and (ii) certain accredited investors entered into contribution agreements with Rorschach, pursuant to which such investors agreed to contribute HYPE tokens and/or cash to Rorschach immediately prior to the Closing (the “Contributions”). The gross proceeds received from the Closing PIPE and the Contributions consisted of $299.9 million of cash and 12,517,592 HYPE tokens valued at $580.5 million based on the fair value of the shares issued for the tokens for an aggregate fair value of $880.4 million, before deducting the allocated transaction costs. At the Closing, the shares of Sonnet common stock and membership interests in Rorschach issued pursuant to the Closing PIPE and the Contributions, respectively, were converted into an aggregate of 123,354,259 shares of HSI common stock (“Common Stock”) and 166,173 shares of HSI Series A preferred stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”). The gross proceeds amount of $880.4 million was recorded to Common Stock and Series A Preferred Stock based on the respective par values, with the

excess of the gross proceeds above par values recorded to additional paid-in capital. Additional paid-in capital was reduced for the impact of cash paid for transaction costs of $2.3 million related to the Closing PIPE financing. Additionally, as noted in Note 5 of the accompanying financial statements, on the Closing Date, such approximately 12.5 million HYPE tokens were valued at $411.3 million, resulting in a loss on commitment of $169.2 million recognized by the Company on the HYPE tokens. The majority of net proceeds from the Transaction are intended to establish our HYPE treasury strategy. Subsequently, during the year ended June 30, 2026, we purchased an additional 16,537,519 HYPE tokens for approximately $773.4 million at the respective times of purchase.

Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction Agreement, at the effective time of the Transaction (the “Effective Time”):

Also pursuant to the terms of the Transaction Agreement, (a) the equity holders of Rorschach immediately prior to the Closing received, in the aggregate, that number of shares of Common Stock equal to one-fifth of the aggregate amount of the cash and HYPE Tokens Value (as defined in the Transaction Agreement) held by Rorschach immediately prior to the Closing, divided by $1.25 (except that one equity holder of Rorschach received, in lieu of a portion of the shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable to it, shares of Series A Preferred Stock), and (b) at the Closing we issued to the Advisor (as defined below) 7,761,860 shares of Common Stock (the “Advisor Shares”) and the Advisor Warrants (defined below).

As of June 30, 2026, we had the following outstanding securities (in addition to the CVRs):

Disposition of Certain Sonnet Assets

During the year ended June 30, 2026, we entered into an asset purchase agreement (the "APA") with Guidant Bio Therapeutics Inc. ("Guidant"). In connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the APA, we transferred $1.325 million in cash, various developmental assets and patents related to Sonnet's tumor delivery platforms, certain employees and Sonnet's Australian subsidiary to Guidant, and subsequently in the fourth fiscal quarter in accordance with the terms of the APA provided an additional $1.0 million upon the execution of definitive investment agreements. In exchange, we received a 40% common stock interest in Guidant. In connection with the APA, we engaged Guidant under a transaction services agreement (the "TSA") to provide services to us for fees of $0.175 million, paid at the closing of the APA.

Equity Facility

On October 22, 2025, we entered into an agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) to purchase up to $1.0 billion of shares of our Common Stock with Chardan Capital Markets LLC (“Chardan”). Pursuant to and upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in the Purchase Agreement, we have the right from time to time at our option to direct Chardan to purchase up to $1.0 billion of shares of our Common Stock. Sales of our Common Stock to Chardan under the Purchase Agreement, and the timing of any sales, are determined by us from time to time in our sole discretion and depend on a variety of factors, including, among other things, market conditions, the trading price of our Common Stock and determinations by us regarding the use of proceeds from any sale of such Common Stock. The net proceeds from any sales under this facility (the "Equity Facility") will depend on the frequency with, and prices at which the shares of our Common Stock are sold to Chardan. To the extent we sell shares under the Purchase Agreement, we currently plan to use any proceeds therefrom for general corporate purposes, including potential purchases of HYPE tokens. As of June 30, 2026, 76,063,600 shares of common stock have been issued under the Equity Facility for gross proceeds of $646.6 million.

Per the requirements of the Purchase Agreement, we paid total fees of $1.1 million to Chardan for the year ended June 30, 2026. Fees consisted of initial amounts paid at inception, in addition to additional commitment fees based on the amount of shares sold under the Purchase Agreement, including $0.3 million paid upon the Company's receipt of an aggregate of $25.0 million in proceeds from sales of Common Stock under the Purchase Agreement, and $0.6 million paid upon the Company's receipt of an aggregate of $50.0 million in proceeds from sales of Common Stock under the Purchase Agreement.

Advisor Rights and Strategic Advisor Agreement

Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, on the Closing Date, we entered into the Advisor Rights Agreement and the Strategic Advisor Agreement with the Advisor, and we issued to the Advisor three Advisor Warrant. Pursuant to the Advisor Rights Agreement, among other things, for so long as the Advisor and its affiliates continue to own at least 10% of the total number of shares of our Common Stock held by the Advisor as of immediately following the Closing, the Advisor will have the right to nominate a number of Advisor Directors to our board of directors equal to the result of (rounded up to the nearest whole number) (a) the percentage determined by dividing (i) the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the Advisor (together with its affiliates) (on an “as-converted” and “as exercised” basis and without applying any “blocker” provisions limiting the exercise or conversion of any securities held by any such person) by (ii) the total number of shares of Common Stock then outstanding (on an “as-converted” and “as exercised” basis), multiplied by (b) the then current size of the board of directors (counting, for purposes of such determination, all vacancies as filled), but in any event at least one director, who shall be the Chairman of the Board. In addition, for so long as the Minimum Holding Condition is satisfied, we will take all necessary action to cause the board to be comprised of at least five directors, including the Advisor Directors, and to consist of the requisite number of directors meeting the independence requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market (or other securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then listed). The Advisor Rights Agreement also provides the Advisor with certain information rights, and subjects the Advisor Shares and Advisor Warrants (and underlying shares of Common Stock) to lock-up restrictions applicable, subject to certain exceptions, for a period ending on the earlier of (x) the first anniversary of the Closing Date, (y) the date on which we complete a liquidation, merger, stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of Common Stock for cash, securities or other property, or (z) with respect to any securities subject to the lock-up, the date on which the last sale price of the Common Stock

equals or exceeds an amount per share of Common Stock equal to 150% of the price (or deemed price) for which the Advisor acquired such securities.

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to provide us with certain technical advisory services related to the digital asset ecosystem, including Hyperliquid and related digital assets, developments in digital asset industries, the selection of third-party vendors with respect to asset management and related digital asset services and other strategic advice regarding digital assets treasury operations for a term of five years (subject to earlier termination under certain circumstances). The Advisory Agreement provides that, unless otherwise agreed by Advisor and subject in all respects to applicable law, in the event that we raise equity or equity-linked financing during the term, the Advisor will be entitled to receive grants of equity in the form of (a) shares of Common Stock equal to 5% of the number of shares of Common Stock issued or issuable pursuant to such financing and (b) warrants to purchase an aggregate number of shares of Common Stock equal to 15% of the number of shares of Common Stock issued or issuable pursuant to such financing, in substantially the same form as the Advisor Warrants, or as otherwise may be agreed by us and the Advisor. The Advisor has waived its right to receive such additional equity grants on account of any equity or equity-linked financing consummated by the Company following the Closing, unless and until it revokes such waiver with respect to future financings. Revocation requires two weeks’ advance notice provided to the Company and no such notice has been provided through the date of this filing. The Advisor shall also be entitled to receive such additional compensation, if any, as may be approved by the Company's board of directors.

Each Advisor Warrant is exercisable to purchase an aggregate of 9,131,600 shares of Common Stock for a period of five years following the Closing Date. The three Advisor Warrants have per share exercise prices equal to $9.375, $12.50 and $18.75, respectively (in each case subject to adjustment for stock splits, share dividends and other similar events).

Contingent Value Rights Agreement

Also pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, at the Closing we entered into a Contingent Value Rights Agreement (the “CVR Agreement”) with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as rights agent (“Rights Agent”), pursuant to which holders of shares of Sonnet common stock, excluding the shares of Sonnet common stock issued pursuant to the Closing PIPE, and in-the-money warrants, in each case, as of immediately prior to the Effective Time, received one CVR for each then-outstanding share of Sonnet common stock held by such stockholder (or, in the case of Sonnet in-the-money warrants, each share of Sonnet common stock for which such in-the-money warrants was exercisable into as of such date). The CVR Payment (as defined in the CVR Agreement) will be payable upon the closing of a sale, license, transfer, disposition, divestiture or other monetization transaction (i.e., a royalty transaction) (or a series of transactions) and/or winding down of, or other disposition(s) of any the Company Legacy Assets (as defined in the CVR Agreement) during the period beginning on the Closing Date and ending on the third anniversary of the Closing Date. The shares of Common Stock issuable in connection with the CVR Payment are subject to certain deductions pursuant to the terms of the CVR Agreement.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective as of the Closing Date, the stockholders of Sonnet approved the Hyperliquid Strategies Inc 2025 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2025 Equity Incentive Plan”), and the 2025 Equity Incentive Plan became effective. The 2025 Equity Incentive Plan permits the grant of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards, and other stock-based awards, as well as the grant of dividend equivalents. Employees, directors and independent contractors of us and our subsidiaries are all eligible to participate in the 2025 Equity Incentive Plan, provided that incentive stock options may only be granted to employees. A total of 6,351,278 shares of Common Stock are reserved for awards under the 2025 Equity Incentive Plan.

During the year ended June 30, 2026, we granted 1,169,558 RSUs and recognized stock-based compensation expense of $0.9 million. No stock-based compensation expense was recognized for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025.

Stock Repurchase Program

On December 8, 2025, we announced that our board of directors had authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $30 million of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock that will be in place for up to 12 months. For the year ended June 30, 2026, a total of 3,067,097 shares of Common Stock were repurchased by us for a total of approximately $10.5 million.

Stockholders’ Equity

On the Closing Date, we adopted an amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which became effective upon the filing thereof with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (the “Restated Charter”). Among other things, the Restated Charter increased the authorized capital stock of the Company to consist of 2,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Preferred Stock”).

Also on the Closing Date, the Board adopted and we filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a certificate of designation (the “Certificate of Designation”) designating the rights, preferences and limitations of the Series A Preferred Stock. Up to 200,000 shares were designated Series A Preferred Stock, with each share of Series A Preferred Stock having a stated value equal to $1,000 (the “Stated Value”). Each share of Series A Preferred Stock will be convertible, at the option of the holder, into that number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the Stated Value by $6.25 (the “Conversion Price”). The Conversion Price may be adjusted pursuant to the Certificate of Designations for stock dividends and stock splits, subsequent rights offerings, pro rata distributions of dividends or the occurrence of a Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the Certificate of Designation). A holder of Series A Preferred Stock will not have the right to convert any portion of its Series A Preferred Stock if the holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% (or, at the election of the holder, 9.99%) of the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such conversion.

The shares of Series A Preferred Stock are not redeemable by us and are not entitled to receive dividends, except that if dividends are paid on the Common Stock then we would be required to pay a dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock on a pro rata basis with the Common Stock determined on an as-converted basis. The Series A Preferred Stock has no voting rights, except as required by the Restated Charter, applicable law and with respect to any vote to approve a Fundamental Transaction (in which case each holder of Series A Preferred Stock would be entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of Common Stock into which such holder’s shares of Series A Preferred Stock were convertible).

Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, the then holders of the Series A Preferred Stock would be entitled to participate with the holders of Common Stock then outstanding, pro rata as a single class on an as-converted basis.

Key Factors Affecting Our Performance

Limited Operating History

Each of the Company and Rorschach has a limited operating history and there is limited historical financial information upon which to base an evaluation of their performance. The Company’s and Rorschach’s respective financial statements must be considered in light of the uncertainties, risks, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stages of operations. As each entity was recently incorporated, the audited financial statements of Rorschach as of and for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) to June 30, 2025 presented in this Annual Report do not present results for the full twelve-month period or for any prior periods.

Public Company Expenses

Our primary strategic objective is to accumulate HYPE tokens on behalf of our stockholders and to participate in the Hyperliquid ecosystem over the long term. We intend to implement this objective by using the net proceeds from the Closing PIPE and any future capital-raising transactions to accumulate HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid ecosystem. In addition to its HYPE token accumulation strategy, we seek to generate income through the selective deployment of its HYPE holdings. Our primary income-generating activity is staking substantially all of its HYPE holdings, which we expect will generate ongoing staking rewards. On an opportunistic basis, we may selectively deploy a portion of our HYPE holdings or future capital-raising proceeds into mergers and acquisitions involving businesses operating within or related to the Hyperliquid ecosystem. We may consider acquiring other digital asset treasury companies holding HYPE positions or entities that directly contribute to or operate within the Hyperliquid blockchain and its DeFi infrastructure.

We have incurred and expect to incur increased expenses in connection with our status as a public company (for legal, insurance, financial reporting, accounting and auditing compliance), as well as for operating expenses and those related to our HYPE treasury strategy.

Financial Overview

Revenue

Digital Assets

Digital assets are initially recorded at cost and then subsequently remeasured at fair value as of the balance sheet date with changes in fair value recognized as unrealized gains or losses in operating income (expense). Upon derecognition of the digital assets, we recognize realized gains or losses in operating income (expense) on the consolidated statements of operations, based upon the fair value of digital assets on the date of derecognition. We recognize revenue by applying the guidance in ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”).

Staking Revenue

The Company stakes substantially all of its HYPE tokens. HYPE tokens earned from validators, in the form of staking rewards, are recognized as revenue when we satisfy our performance obligations (i.e., providing our tokens to the validator in order to validate blocks or transactions as determined by the protocol) ratably over the contract term. Staking rewards accrue every minute and are distributed to us on a daily basis. The HYPE tokens earned are non-cash consideration and therefore measured at fair value at the inception of each contract. Because we do not unilaterally control the validator, we are not the principal to the validation service. As such, we present staking rewards as revenue on a net basis, reflecting only the portion of protocol rewards to which it is entitled.

Validator Commission Income

On May 13, 2026, we launched a validator node on the Hyperliquid network, “Hyperliquid Strategies x Unit” (the "Validator") in partnership with Nexus Research Labs, Inc. (“Unit”). The Company stakes the majority of its tokens to the Validator. The Validator operates within the HyperCore infrastructure and participates in the HyperBFT consensus mechanism, producing blocks and validating transactions alongside the network’s active validators. The Validator is able to accept delegations from both us and third-party HYPE holders (the customers), and we earn commission income from staking rewards at the Validator level. Under our validator services agreement with Unit, commission revenue earned at the Validator level is shared with Unit, who is responsible for the day-to-day technical operation of the validator infrastructure, while we exercise direct oversight over validator performance and compliance with our staking risk management framework. The Validator earns commissions, paid in HYPE tokens, for its services. Commission income is recognized as revenue when blocks or transactions are successfully validated in accordance with the protocol. Under the Company's Validator Service Agreement with Unit, Unit controls the operation, maintenance, monitoring, and technical management of Validator Nodes and Platform on behalf of the Company. As such, we have concluded that we do not control the validator service, and therefore we are not the principal to the validation service. Accordingly, we present validator commission income on a net basis in Staking and Validator Commission revenue, reflecting only the portion of protocol rewards and commission to which we are entitled after amounts payable to Unit.

Other Income (Expense)

We hold a portion of our capital in highly liquid money market funds and short term treasury bills in addition to cash deposits placed with financial institutions of high credit quality. These allocations offer liquidity while providing a yield in the form of interest income. This income is classified as “Interest income” on our consolidated statements of operations.

The Company's Equity Facility qualifies as a derivative. Any changes in the fair value of any equity sold between the time the forward was entered into (trade execution under the Equity Facility) and the ultimate settlement is treated as other income (expense). This income (expense) is classified as “Other expense” on our consolidated statements of operations.

Selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses

Selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses, legal and other professional services, and insurance expenses. We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will decrease in the short term as requirements to support our continued research and development and commercial activities decline subsequent to the establishment of our treasury strategy, in addition to the completion of the Transaction Agreement and APA, discussed in Note 5 of the accompanying financial statements.

Results of Operations

The Company has selected June 30 as its fiscal year end. The following is a summary of the Company’s results of operations for the year ended June 30, 2026 compared with the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025.

Revenue

Revenue for the year ended June 30, 2026 totaled $9.5 million, which was primarily net staking revenue. As noted above, we present staking rewards as revenue on a net basis.

The Company did not have revenue for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025.

Digital Assets

Unrealized gain on HYPE digital tokens for the year ended June 30, 2026 was $709.9 million, resulting from the fair value changes of HYPE at June 30, 2026. Additionally, we recognized an unrealized loss on HYPE contribution commitment of $169.2 million, which was the result of a decrease in fair value of the 12.5 million HYPE tokens from the Closing PIPE commitment amount, as further described in Note 5 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

As we did not hold any digital tokens for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025, there was no unrealized gain or loss during the period.

IPR&D write-off from Sonnet acquisition

We recognized a loss of $35.6 million on acquired IPR&D from the Sonnet acquisition for the year ended June 30, 2026, as it was determined to have no alternative future use at the time of the asset acquisition.

Selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses

Our selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses for the year ended June 30, 2026 were $14.0 million, which includes professional fees, salaries and wages, insurance, and research and development costs.

We incurred expenses of $0.6 million for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025 related to formation and operating costs.

Other Income (Expense)

Other expense for the year ended June 30, 2026 totaled approximately $11.6 million. Other expense for the year ended June 30, 2026 primarily resulted from an expense under the Equity Facility related to the increase in the price of our equity between the share issuance and settlement as well a loss of $0.4 million related to our share of losses from our equity method investment in Guidant. These expenses were partially offset by interest income, which is derived from money market funds, treasury assets, and interest received on cash positions held with financial institutions.

No other income was recognized for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025.

Income tax expense (deferred)

We recognized an income tax expense of $183.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2026 related to the creation of a deferred tax liability at the closing of the transaction in addition to a deferred tax liability created by the increase in value of our HYPE digital tokens during the period.

No income tax expense was recognized for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 205-40, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern”, we have the responsibility to evaluate whether conditions and/or events raise substantial doubt about our ability to meet future financial obligations as they become due within one year after the date that our financial statements are issued. Since our inception, we have had a history of recurring net losses from operations and working capital deficits.

As disclosed in the June 30, 2025 financial statements of Rorschach, there was substantial doubt about Rorschach's ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the date the financial statements were issued. This was based on Rorschach having insufficient funds to pay its liabilities, absent any additional funding, which obtaining such funding was uncertain. During the year ended June 30, 2026, we raised capital through the Closing PIPE, and entered into the Purchase Agreement, which has alleviated the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Based on our current financial condition and forecast of cash flow needs for the next twelve months, we expect that our existing resources will be sufficient to enable us to fund our anticipated level of operations through one year from the date these financial statements were issued.

We plan to continue to pursue additional methods to obtain funding for working capital in the future, however, such funding may not be available to us. Although we believe that such capital sources will continue to be available, there can be no assurances that additional working capital will be available to us when needed, or if available, on terms acceptable to us. If we are unable to obtain capital on terms that are satisfactory to us, when we require it, our ability to continue to grow or support the business and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited, which may adversely affect our business plans.

Cash Flows

Since inception, our operations have primarily been funded by proceeds from equity financings.

Our net income (loss) was $305.5 million and ($0.6) million for the year ended June 30, 2026 and for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025, respectively. As of June 30, 2026, we had accumulated earnings of approximately $304.9 million. As of June 30, 2026, we had cash and cash

equivalents of $137.9 million and HYPE digital assets with a fair value of $1.9 billion, working capital (inclusive of cash and cash equivalents) of $148.7 million and stockholders’ equity of $1.9 billion.

During the year ended June 30, 2026, our sources and uses of cash were as follows:

Net cash used in operating activities was approximately ($19.1) million, which includes net income of $305.5 million, offset by ($317.3) million of net non-cash items and net changes in operating assets and liabilities of ($7.4) million.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended June 30, 2026 was approximately ($777.4) million, which was primarily related to HYPE and net USDC purchases, partially offset by the cash acquired from the acquisition of Sonnet.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended June 30, 2026 totaled approximately $934.5 million, which was primarily attributable to $947.3 million of net cash proceeds from the Closing PIPE, and subsequent equity issuances, offset by $2.3 million in payments for equity issuance costs and $10.5 million in payments for the repurchase of Common Stock.

We incurred a net loss of $0.6 million for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025 related to formation and operating costs, offset by a $0.6 million net change in operating assets and liabilities. There was no net cash used in investing or financing activities during the period.

Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements

We had no obligations, assets or liabilities, which would be considered off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2026. We do not participate in transactions that create relationships with unaudited consolidated entities or financial partnerships, often referred to as variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements. We have not entered into any off-balance sheet financing arrangements, established any special purpose entities, guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities, or purchased any non-financial assets.

Contractual Obligations

We do not have any material long-term debt, capital lease obligations, operating lease obligations or long-term liabilities that affect our liquidity or capital resources.

In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts for services. The amount owed by us as of June 30, 2026 is $3.7 million and is included in “accounts payable” and “other current liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets.

Critical Accounting Estimates

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of consolidated financial statements also requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our management.

We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if: (i) the accounting estimate requires us to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made, and (ii) changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period or use of different estimates that we reasonably could have used in the current period, would have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. There are items within our financial statements that require estimation but are not deemed critical, as defined above. There are no critical accounting estimates as of June 30, 2026.

JOBS Act

On April 5, 2012, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”) was signed into law. The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, relax certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies. We will qualify as an “emerging growth company” and under the JOBS Act will be allowed to comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements based on the effective date for private (not publicly traded) companies. We are electing to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards, and as a result, we may not comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. As a result, our consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates.

Additionally, we are in the process of evaluating the benefits of relying on the other reduced reporting requirements provided by the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, if, as an “emerging growth company”, we choose to rely on such exemptions we may not be required to, among other things: (1) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; (2) provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of non-emerging growth public companies under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; (3) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the PCAOB regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the consolidated financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis); and (4) disclose certain executive compensation-related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the CEO’s compensation to median employee compensation. These exemptions will apply until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The consolidated financial statements required pursuant to this item are included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report, beginning on page F‑1.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2026. Based upon their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

This Annual Report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting due to a transition period established by rules of the SEC for newly public companies.

In addition, the Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm, as we are not required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for our Annual Report on Form 10-K until the first year that we cease to qualify as an “emerging growth company” and a "non-accelerated filer.”

As a result, we performed additional analysis as deemed necessary to ensure that our financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this Annual Report present fairly in all material respects our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the period presented.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In connection with the Business Combination Agreement and the receipt of digital assets, the Company established internal controls over the safe keeping of these assets and external reporting related to the Company’s digital asset treasury strategy. Other than the foregoing, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period from July 2, 2025 through June 30, 2026 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

The information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or an amendment to this report, which the Company intends to file with the SEC within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year end to which this report relates.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements and report of the CBIZ CPAs P.C., Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are included in Section IV of this report beginning on page F-1.

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are either inapplicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto contained in this Annual Report.

* Filed herewith.

** These certifications are furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

#The schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule and/or exhibit will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

†Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of

Hyperliquid Strategies Inc

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hyperliquid Strategies Inc (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2026 and for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2026 and for the period from June 13, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ CBIZ CPAs P.C.

CBIZ CPAs P.C.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2025.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

August 27, 2026

HYPERLIQUID STRATEGIES INC

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

HYPERLIQUID STRATEGIES INC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

HYPERLIQUID STRATEGIES INC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

For the Year Ended June 30, 2026 and for the Period From June 13, 2025 (Inception) Through June 30, 2025

(In thousands, except share amounts)