Form 6-K Sayona Mining Ltd For: Jul 22

---

The newly reported drill results from the Main area are located outside the current resource pit shell and may contribute to future resource growth. Key intercepts are summarised in Table 4. Both recent and historical drilling confirm the northern extension of the Main pegmatites at depth, consistent with their moderate dip of 20° to the north. Notably, several significant new intercepts were obtained near the eastern edge of the Main area, adjacent to the Inter zone. These include very thick mineralised zones (25 to 38 metres) located outside the pit shell. The results confirm a stacked geometry of sub-horizontal LCT pegmatites, several of which are highly promising in both grade and thickness. Highlights include: 1.85% Li₂O over 38.45m (hole 1331-22-185-ext), 1.44% Li₂O over 30.20m (hole SYN-24-0883), 2.15% Li₂O over 33.40m (hole SYN-24-0896), and 1.92% Li₂O over 31.40m (hole SYN-24-0920). These findings continue to validate the sub-horizontal continuity of mineralisation (see Figure 1).

	Drillhole	From (m)	To (m)	Length (m)	Li2O %	Description	Area
	SYN-24-0898ext	404.15	423.30	19.15	2.31	19.15m @ 2.31% Li2O from 404.15m
	SYN-24-0899	221.20	229.60	8.40	1.39	8.40m @ 1.39% Li2O from 221.20m
		234.60	237.25	2.65	1.70	2.65m @ 1.70% Li2O from 234.60m
		240.55	243.70	3.15	1.28	3.15m @ 1.28% Li2O from 240.55m
	SYN-24-0900	157.60	173.00	15.40	1.82	15.40m @ 1.82% Li2O from 157.60m
		230.35	243.85	13.50	1.79	13.50m @ 1.79% Li2O from 230.35m
	SYN-24-0901	170.00	180.20	10.20	1.28	10.20m @ 1.28% Li2O from 170.00m
	SYN-24-0903	185.10	226.10	41.00	1.69	41.00m @ 1.69% Li2O from 185.10m
	SYN-24-0906	211.05	226.20	15.15	1.36	15.15m @ 1.36% Li2O from 211.05m
		228.70	241.35	12.65	1.07	12.65m @ 1.07% Li2O from 228.70m
		327.30	330.85	3.55	1.91	3.55m @ 1.91% Li2O from 327.30m
		353.50	367.35	13.85	1.32	13.85m @ 1.32% Li2O from 353.50m
	SYN-24-0907	230.65	266.05	35.40	1.35	35.40m @ 1.35% Li2O from 230.65m
		302.65	305.30	2.65	2.22	2.65m @ 2.22% Li2O from 302.65m
	SYN-24-0908	139.95	142.00	2.05	1.04	2.05m @ 1.04% Li2O from 139.95m
		237.80	244.80	7.00	1.79	7.00m @ 1.79% Li2O from 237.80m
	SYN-24-0909	302.30	314.90	12.60	2.52	12.60m @ 2.52% Li2O from 302.30m
	SYN-24-0912	185.20	187.80	2.60	1.31	2.60m @ 1.31% Li2O from 185.20m
		197.80	200.75	2.95	1.18	2.95m @ 1.18% Li2O from 197.80m
	SYN-24-0921	316.00	318.00	2.00	1.83	2.00m @ 1.83% Li2O from 316.00m
		340.00	342.50	2.50	2.33	2.50m @ 2.33% Li2O from 340.00m
	SYN-24-0931	224.90	247.25	22.35	1.41	22.35m @ 1.41% Li2O from 224.90m
		299.85	305.75	5.90	1.46	5.90m @ 1.46% Li2O from 299.85m
	SYN-24-0932	223.15	233.20	10.05	1.12	10.05m @ 1.12% Li2O from 223.15m
		244.90	259.00	14.10	1.31	14.10m @ 1.31% Li2O from 244.90m
		267.70	270.90	3.20	1.18	3.20m @ 1.18% Li2O from 267.70m
		330.65	339.80	9.15	1.79	9.15m @ 1.79% Li2O from 330.65m
	SYN-24-0939	366.15	398.40	32.25	1.59	32.25m @ 1.59% Li2O from 366.15m

	Drillhole	From (m)	To (m)	Length (m)	Li2O %	Description	Area
	SYN-24-0887	132.15	148.50	16.35	1.78	16.35m @ 1.78% Li2O from 132.15m
		200.90	227.65	26.75	1.82	26.75m @ 1.82% Li2O from 200.90m
	SYN-24-0911	7.65	14.55	6.90	1.66	6.90m @ 1.66% Li2O from 7.65m	Moleon
	SYN-24-0911A	7.50	15.10	7.60	1.57	7.60m @ 1.57% Li2O from 7.50m
		197.60	201.95	4.35	1.83	4.35m @ 1.83% Li2O from 197.60m
	SYN-24-0915	169.55	172.10	2.55	0.76	2.55 @ 0.76% Li2O from 169.55m

•	Drilling confirms thick, high-grade lithium intercepts and further down-dip expansion of the Moblan pegmatite system – 27 April 2025

•	Moblan continues to deliver more high-grade lithium results from the 2024 drill program – 30 January 2025

•	Moblan mineral resource increase 81% to 93Mt – 27 August 2024

•	Moblan drilling reveals further high-grade lithium intersections – 13 June 2024

•	Moblan drilling delivers thick, high-grade intersections – 26 May 2024

•	Moblan Lithium Project Definitive Feasibility Study – 20 February 2024

•	Moblan drilling shows expansion potential – 23 October 2023

•	Drill results significantly expand Moblan lithium footprint – 11 July 2023

•	Moblan boosted by significant increase in lithium resource – 17 April 2023

	South Area
	Drillhole	East (m)	North (m)	Elevation (m)	Azimuth	Dip Degrees	End of Hole (m)
	SYN-24-0816	507,453.39	5,619,711.36	478.33	180	-60	225.00
	SYN-24-0817	507,549.46	5,619,697.12	480.11	180	-77	261.15
	SYN-24-0819	507,500.78	5,619,724.58	479.52	180	-62	201.00
	SYN-24-0824	507,613.25	5,619,763.60	482.13	182	-70	180.00
	SYN-24-0852	506,376.79	5,619,792.51	568.24	210	-63	168.00
	SYN-24-0854	506,452.95	5,619,632.92	550.58	180	-70	141.00
	SYN-24-0855	506,468.44	5,619,929.90	540.39	180	-70	102.00
	SYN-24-0856	506,469.63	5,619,571.10	544.20	165	-56	120.00
	SYN-24-0857	506,480.01	5,619,892.32	539.37	180	-55	102.00
	SYN-24-0859	506,526.31	5,619,886.58	536.83	177	-60	402.00
	SYN-24-0861	506,563.37	5,619,944.41	536.02	180	-70	351.00
	SYN-24-0862	506,557.07	5,619,566.21	533.92	180	-57	141.00
	SYN-24-0864	506,598.31	5,619,548.19	539.45	188	-73	141.00
	SYN-24-0866	506,642.67	5,619,830.42	537.92	188	-62	100.00
	SYN-24-0873	507,452.40	5,619,890.18	484.40	184	-73	375.00
	SYN-24-0874	507,620.58	5,619,824.44	483.64	176	-75	327.00
	SYN-24-0918	507,304.49	5,619,619.89	478.35	194	-46	279.00
	SYN-24-0925	506,896.29	5,619,578.12	494.30	180	-65	171.00
	SYN-24-0926	506,954.76	5,619,511.41	478.79	180	-65	180.00
	SYN-24-0927	506,889.63	5,619,515.65	495.47	180	-75	141.00
	SYN-24-0936	507,303.98	5,619,619.75	478.28	180	-57	201.00
	SYN-24-0937	507,352.61	5,619,629.01	478.66	180	-70	192.00
				Sub-total	22	drillholes	4,501.15

	Main Area
	Drillhole	East (m)	North (m)	Elevation (m)	Azimuth	Dip Degrees	End of Hole (m)
	1331-16-112-ext	507,191.50	5,620,029.70	516.20	179	-53	444.60
	1331-16-115-ext	507,250.70	5,620,267.70	538.60	179	-56	462.00
	1331-22-165-ext	507,251.68	5,619,959.91	504.43	183	-69	348.00
	1331-22-167-ext	507,096.81	5,619,952.81	504.19	172	-60	411.00
	1331-22-171-ext	507,106.31	5,620,075.31	509.04	181	-51	462.00
	1331-22-173-ext	507,151.86	5,620,072.75	515.38	180	-55	426.00
	1331-22-179-ext	507,175.02	5,620,187.09	518.80	180	-55	420.00
	1331-22-182-ext	507,282.30	5,620,117.43	524.36	160	-55	435.00
	1331-22-185-ext	507,346.29	5,620,228.59	537.98	192	-58	435.00
	1331-22-202-ext	506,950.44	5,620,099.76	505.27	177	-82	413.40
	1331-22-210-ext	507,002.96	5,619,799.15	506.79	182	-81	423.00
	1331-22-291-ext	507,002.75	5,619,986.40	506.91	180	-80	450.00
	1331-22-292-ext	507,000.99	5,620,046.12	502.39	179	-80	423.00
	1331-22-293-ext	507,013.51	5,620,109.58	503.30	200	-80	432.00
	1331-22-295-ext	506,983.90	5,620,198.29	500.46	172	-75	408.00
	1331-22-318-ext	507,297.38	5,620,302.75	548.11	180	-65	414.00
	1331-22-344-ext	507,304.10	5,620,409.24	561.35	0	-85	420.00
	1331-22-496-ext	507,401.53	5,620,500.67	569.31	180	-65	494.60
	SYN-24-0742-ext	507,154.05	5,620,253.66	512.84	180	-65	399.00

	Main Area
	Drillhole	East (m)	North (m)	Elevation (m)	Azimuth	Dip Degrees	End of Hole (m)
	SYN-24-0751	507,257.74	5,620,396.88	552.75	177	-63	222.00
	SYN-24-0751-ext	507,257.74	5,620,396.88	552.75	177	-63	471.00
	SYN-24-0775-ext	507,243.39	5,620,283.42	538.18	180	-65	417.00
	SYN-24-0794-ext	507,260.90	5,620,323.06	546.97	180	-65	444.00
	SYN-24-0806-ext	507,190.04	5,620,334.94	526.62	180	-65	411.00
	SYN-24-0875	507,347.74	5,620,044.23	500.51	175	-61	393.00
	SYN-24-0876	507,297.84	5,619,952.86	490.77	175	-68	378.00
	SYN-24-0883	507,346.81	5,620,178.23	532.30	182	-70	360.00
	SYN-24-0895	507,347.55	5,620,044.91	500.95	180	-72	546.00
	SYN-24-0896	507,364.13	5,620,066.53	508.86	195	-80	351.00
	SYN-24-0920	507,286.91	5,620,048.96	513.33	180	-72	351.00
	SYN-24-0929	507,221.78	5,620,071.67	516.65	180	-65	370.50
	SYN-24-0930	507,396.86	5,620,211.41	532.60	152	-72	387.00
	SYN-24-0933	507,124.03	5,620,151.18	508.29	175	-52	411.00
	SYN-24-0934A	507,124.03	5,620,151.14	508.23	175	-66	384.00
				Sub-total	34	drillholes	14,017.10

	Inter Area
	Drillhole	East (m)	North (m)	Elevation (m)	Azimuth	Dip Degrees	End of Hole (m)
	1331-22-343-ext	507,449.56	5,620,397.60	564.29	0	-85	408.00
	SYN-24-0731	507,438.93	5,620,395.68	565.58	180	-60	381.00
	1331-22-736-ext	507,446.71	5,620,455.56	583.24	180	-65	450.00
	1331-22-785-ext	507,470.73	5,620,191.26	514.99	130	-65	630.00
	SYN-24-0827	507,625.88	5,620,029.82	496.72	130	-53	318.00
	SYN-24-0830	507,652.38	5,620,059.58	493.98	130	-50	336.00
	SYN-24-0832	507,579.68	5,619,966.11	491.15	188	-65	426.00
	SYN-24-0833	507,605.87	5,619,972.39	493.76	180	-60	351.00
	SYN-24-0834	507,557.15	5,619,933.03	493.63	183	-62	363.00
	SYN-24-0835	507,651.71	5,620,059.42	493.96	145	-72	276.00
	SYN-24-0836	507,652.13	5,620,059.73	493.98	130	-60	300.00
	SYN-24-0837	507,579.15	5,619,966.56	490.92	195	-75	486.00
	SYN-24-0853	507,605.87	5,619,971.93	493.66	181	-52	390.00
	SYN-24-0860	507,606.60	5,619,973.46	493.69	160	-60	390.00
	SYN-24-0877	507,664.45	5,620,077.24	490.30	130	-67	252.00
	SYN-24-0878	507,461.14	5,620,112.59	507.32	143	-67	606.00
	SYN-24-0879	507,500.86	5,620,106.00	491.02	125	-58	351.00
	SYN-24-0880	507,525.31	5,620,143.71	482.23	160	-73	327.00
	SYN-24-0881A	507,521.19	5,620,209.66	498.40	130	-58	357.00
	SYN-24-0884	507,613.00	5,620,227.31	498.60	128	-73	300.00
	SYN-24-0885	507,664.53	5,620,014.36	496.05	162	-57	351.00
	SYN-24-0886	507,660.23	5,620,202.49	489.48	93	-46	291.00
	SYN-24-0888	507,573.99	5,620,132.78	478.58	99	-53	300.00
	SYN-24-0889	507,568.98	5,620,048.10	483.56	182	-71	15.15
	SYN-24-0889A	507,568.95	5,620,047.90	483.54	182	-71	360.00
	SYN-24-0890	507,624.85	5,620,030.68	496.65	191	-80	300.00

	Inter Area
	Drillhole	East (m)	North (m)	Elevation (m)	Azimuth	Dip Degrees	End of Hole (m)
	SYN-24-0891	507,662.20	5,620,014.57	496.18	217	-70	315.00
	SYN-24-0892	507,650.50	5,620,059.36	493.77	170	-66	306.00
	SYN-24-0893	507,747.21	5,620,049.96	492.77	117	-65	252.00
	SYN-24-0894	507,461.08	5,620,111.89	507.21	152	-59	429.00
	SYN-24-0894-ext	507,461.08	5,620,111.89	507.21	152	-59	531.00
	SYN-24-0897	507,642.76	5,620,251.86	495.25	30	-55	435.00
	SYN-24-0898	507,597.84	5,620,213.67	495.10	30	-50	402.00
	SYN-24-0898-ext	507,597.84	5,620,213.67	495.10	30	-50	438.00
	SYN-24-0899	507,521.73	5,620,084.65	480.81	141	-71	384.00
	SYN-24-0900	507,767.39	5,619,979.57	482.97	100	-48	300.00
	SYN-24-0901	507,766.73	5,619,978.11	483.04	123	-49	300.00
	SYN-24-0902	507,765.37	5,619,977.74	483.10	143	-48	303.00
	SYN-24-0903	507,748.60	5,620,050.84	492.78	167	-48	333.00
	SYN-24-0904	507,764.22	5,619,977.93	483.10	163	-48	300.00
	SYN-24-0905	507,763.07	5,619,978.40	483.05	185	-48	300.00
	SYN-24-0906	507,434.68	5,620,347.20	563.41	103	-67	384.00
	SYN-24-0907	507,434.31	5,620,347.28	563.40	103	-80	369.00
	SYN-24-0908	507,598.85	5,620,461.22	520.77	100	-50	330.00
	SYN-24-0909	507,484.51	5,620,484.17	583.81	102	-49	402.00
	SYN-24-0912	507,602.92	5,620,526.08	535.41	100	-50	258.00
	SYN-24-0914	507,503.92	5,620,535.06	577.26	100	-50	303.00
	SYN-24-0919	507,661.48	5,620,015.22	496.21	200	-58	360.00
	SYN-24-0921	507,606.69	5,619,973.79	493.63	165	-52	401.00
	SYN-24-0931	507,396.53	5,620,211.44	532.67	105	-77	375.00
	SYN-24-0932	507,397.55	5,620,213.31	532.65	173	-64	573.00
	SYN-24-0938	507,513.69	5,620,975.95	520.81	130	-50	264.00
	SYN-24-0939	507,580.58	5,619,967.35	490.83	240	-83	510.00
				Sub-total	53	drillholes	19,172.15

	Moleon Area
	Drillhole	East (m)	North (m)	Elevation (m)	Azimuth	Dip Degrees	End of Hole (m)
	SYN-24-0887	507,825.96	5,620,031.89	485.38	93	-49	267.00
	SYN-24-0911	507,890.86	5,620,505.32	486.51	100	-50	27.00
	SYN-24-0911A	507,890.80	5,620,505.44	486.60	100	-50	240.00
	SYN-24-0913	507,832.89	5,620,529.48	498.41	100	-50	285.00
	SYN-24-0915	507,890.86	5,620,563.65	497.02	100	-50	240.00
	SYN-24-0916	508,191.33	5,620,562.42	468.79	100	-50	102.00
	SYN-24-0917	508,290.38	5,620,590.72	469.48	100	-52	102.00
				Sub-total	7	drillholes	1,263.00
				Total	116	drillholes	38,953.40

	Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
	Sampling techniques		Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.		Sampling at the Moblan Lithium Project (the ‘Project’) is adequate, of good quality and comes from core drilling. Core samples are obtained from diamond drilling (NQ and HQ diameter core). New results from this release were from NQ and BTW core diameter.
			Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.		Geological logging of recovered drill core visually identified pegmatite and its constituent mineralogy to determine the intervals for sampling. Lithium-bearing spodumene is easily identified. Sampling has been determined on geological characteristics and ranges from between 0.25 m and 1.6 m in length. The core was cut using a diamond saw core-cutter, and half-cores were sampled. All pegmatite material intersected downhole has been sampled.
			Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.		Sample preparation and assaying methods are industry-standard and appropriate for this type of mineralisation. The Project is supported by core samples taken by diamond drilling (no other sampling methods were used).

	Drilling techniques		Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).		Drilling from surface was carried out by diamond drilling methods, using a standard tube to recover NQ and HQ size core (no other drilling methods were used). The core was not orientated. Downhole drill azimuth and dip have been determined by TN-14 azimuth aligner and downhole Reflex Gyro multi- and single-shot recording instruments; Flexit multi-shot; and Tropari and acid test for the remaining historical drill holes.
	Drill sample recovery		Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.		Drilling was directly into the hard (fresh) rock, starting at the surface, and core recovery approximates 100%. the core has been marked up, and the core recovery and RQD.
			Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.		To ensure the representative nature of the samples drilling has been by diamond drill core methods, measurements have been recorded. Core recoveries were typically high and considered acceptable, and it is not believed a bias has been introduced into the sampling system.
			Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.		There is no correlation or bias between the grades obtained and core recovery.
	Logging		Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.		All drill core has been geologically logged to a level of detail appropriate for the Project. Geological logging, RQD measurements and structural information have been completed. The logging is qualitative and is supported by photography of marked-up core. The logging was appropriate and of sufficient quality and level of detail to support the mineral resource estimation and mining and metallurgical studies.
			Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.		Geological logging recorded qualitative descriptions of lithology, alteration, mineralisation, veining, and structure. Logging also includes core recovery and RQD measurements.
			The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.		The 2024 Moblan Mineral Resource Estimate (‘2024 MRE’) is supported by 771 surface drillholes for 130,633m drilled between 2002 and the end 2023 and by surface channel samples (samples collected from 10 surface trenches) with database close-out date of April 2nd, 2024 (ASX announcement 27 August 2024). Several results have been published since the 2024 MRE. In 2024, new release covers the results of 94 new drillholes totalling 20,735.75m (ASX announcement 26 May 2024), in June 2024, 34 new drillholes (7,853m) were released (ASX announcement June 13th, 2024) and in January 2025, 57 new drillholes (13,999m) (ASX announcement January 30th, 2025), 99 drillholes (28,513.95) (ASX announcement April 27, 2025). This release covers the results of 116 new drillholes totalling 38,953.40m. The completed and released drill holes for the Project currently amount to 986 drillholes (198,100.35m). The sample database has been established in UTM coordinates (NAD 83 Zone 18).

	Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation		If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.		Drill core has been cut in half by a diamond saw, with half-core samples packaged and grouped into bulk bags for dispatch to the laboratory. Half-core sampling is considered an appropriate method to ensure a sufficient quantity of sample is collected for it to be representative of the drill material and appropriate for the grain size of the material being sampled.
			If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc., and whether sampled wet or dry.		There was no sampling method other than diamond drilling (core drilling).
			For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.		Sampling, sample preparation and quality control protocols are considered appropriate for the material being sampled. Since 2011, sample preparation has been conducted in independent accredited laboratories (SGS laboratories in Toronto, Ontario (Canada) and ALS and AGAT laboratories in Val-d’Or, Québec (Canada)). AGAT: each core sample is dried and weighed, and the entire sample is crushed to 75% passing 2 mm. A split of up to 250 g is taken using a riffle splitter and pulverised to better than 85% passing 75 μm. ALS: each core sample is dried and weighed, and the entire sample is crushed to 70% passing 2 mm. A split of up to 250 g is taken using a riffle splitter and pulverised to better than 85% passing 75 μm.
			Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.		The core samples have been selected by visual logging methods and are considered appropriate for the analytical work being carried out in an industry-standard manner.
			Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.		The remaining half-cores, crushed samples (rejects) and pulverised samples (pulps) are retained for further analysis and quality control checks.
			Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.		Sample sizes are considered appropriate for the style of mineralisation.
	Quality of assay data and laboratory tests		The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.		All samples were analysed at independent accredited laboratories (SGS laboratories in Toronto, Ontario (Canada), and ALS and AGAT laboratories in Val-d’Or, Québec (Canada)). All the 2007–2010 samples were analysed by SGS in Toronto by Sodium Peroxide Fusion and ICP-MS finish using a 0.2 g aliquot of pulverised material. In 2022–2025, all core samples were analysed at ALS by ME-MS589L Sodium Peroxide Fusion and ICP-MS finish using a 0.2 g aliquot of pulverised material. Previous operators and Sayona have regularly inserted third-party reference control samples and blank samples in the sample stream to monitor assay and laboratory performance. Assaying was completed by ALS Laboratories. It is believed that the sampling, assaying and laboratory procedures are representative of the drilled material and appropriate for the Project.

			For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.		There was no sampling method other than diamond drilling. No geophysical tools or XRF instruments have been used in determining mineralisation.
			Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.		QA/QC was ensured by the insertion of Certified Reference Material (‘CRM’), half-core duplicate sampling, and the insertion of blanks into the sample sequence. Protocols include the systematic insertion of CRM standards at approximately 1 for every 25 samples and alternating blank samples of quartz and core duplicate samples at a rate of 1 for every 25 samples in previous operator programmes (SOQUEM). Since June 2022, Sayona's protocols have switched to 1 control sample for every 20 samples. The CRMs used for monitoring lithium values are OREAS 750, OREAS 751, OREAS 752, OREAS 753 and OREAS 999. Occasionally, a CRM for Zn (OREAS 630B) has been used to validate other metals. These standards have been selected to reflect the target mineralisation type. Assays of quality control samples were compared with reference samples in the database and verified as acceptable prior to using the data from the analysed batches. The assaying techniques and quality control protocols used are considered appropriate for the data to be reported in its current form and for the estimation of mineral resources.
	Verification of sampling and assaying		The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.		Sampling intervals defined by the geologist were assigned sample identification numbers prior to core cutting. The results have been reviewed by multiple geologists. The company conducts internal data verification protocols, which have been followed. Significant intersections were verified by company personnel and CPs. There are no currently known drilling, sampling, recovery, or other factors that could materially affect the accuracy or reliability of the data.
			The use of twinned holes.		No twinned holes have been drilled.
			Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.		All sampling and assay information were stored in a secure GeoticLog database with restricted access. Assay results from the laboratory with corresponding sample identification are loaded directly into the GeoticLog database.
			Discuss any adjustment to assay data.		Li% has been converted to Li2O% for reporting purposes. The conversion used is Li2O = Li x 2.1527. No other adjustments to the assay data have been made.
	Location of data points		Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.		The drilling collars are positioned using handheld GPS and then professionally surveyed after completion. The professional survey firms of Paul Roy, Arpenteur-Géomètre, and Caouette, Thériault & Renaud, both based in Chibougamau, provided a land surveyor with a GPS base station to survey the completed drill collar locations. Drill rigs were aligned using an electronic azimuth aligner (TN-14 azimuth aligner). Downhole survey data were collected at 3-m intervals using Reflex EZ and Flexit instruments. Some historical drill holes were subjected to Tropari and acid tests to monitor down-hole deviations. The government’s LIDAR survey of the area was used to prepare a DEM/topographic model for the Project. There are no mine workings on the site.
			Specification of the grid systeusMed.		The grid system is UTM NAD83 Zone 18.

			Quality and adequacy of topographic control.		The quality and adequacy of the topographic control and drill hole database are considered appropriate for the work undertaken, and the data is suitable for use in mineral resource estimation.
	Data spacing and distribution		Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.		The drill hole spacing ranges from 20–65m within the mineral resource area. The spacing between drill hole fences is typically around 50m apart. The drilling grid is looser in areas at the exploration stage and may include isolated drill holes.
			Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserves estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.		The data spacing is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity for the exploration results, yielding Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources within the Main dykes and Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources within the South, Inter and Moleon dykes. Significant assay intercepts remain open. Further drilling is required to determine the extent of currently defined mineralisation. New drilling results obtained since the 2024 MRE database close-out date could potentially locally upgrade some resources and add new resources.
			Whether sample compositing has been applied.		One metre (1m) compositing is applied to samples used for the mineral resource estimation. Samples from drill holes completed after the 2024 MRE were not composited. For the purposes of illustrating exploration results, lithium values for pegmatite dykes are reported as the weighted average of individual samples.
	Orientation of data in relation to geological structure		Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.		Drilling may intersect mineralisation at various angles but is typically orthogonal to the lithium pegmatites dykes. Some drill positions have utilised the same drill pad but with a variable dip to intersect the target mineralisation at depth.
			If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.		The relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is appropriate. Drill holes exploring the extent of the Project intersected four (4) lithium-bearing pegmatite dyke swarms: Main, South, New South and Moleon. Each corresponds to a series of stacked dykes of variable thickness separated by faults. The Main group comprises 5 dykes oriented E-W and dipping gently to the north (N260°/-20°) and two dykes oriented approximately N-S and dipping steeply to the west (N180°/-70°). The South group comprises 12 dykes oriented E-W and nearly sub-horizontal or dipping gently to the south (N260°/-10°) and one dyke oriented approximately N-S and dipping steeply to the west (N180°/-70°). The New South group comprises 12 dykes oriented E-W and nearly sub-horizontal or dipping gently to the south (N260°/-5°) and one dyke oriented approximately N-S and dipping steeply to the west (N180°/-70°). The Moleon group comprises 1 dyke oriented E-W and nearly sub-horizontal or dipping gently to the south (N260°/-5°) and 9 dykes oriented N-S and dipping steeply to the west (N180°/-70°). Spodumene pegmatite dykes in the area are typically tabular bodies, and the reported results appear consistent with that style of mineralisation. Drill hole orientation does not appear to have introduced a sampling bias.
	Sample security		The measures taken to ensure sample security.		All reasonable measures and industry-standard sample and storage protocols have been applied. Sample security is controlled by tracking samples from the drill rig through core logging, sampling, laboratory preparation and analysis, and database entry. Drill core was delivered from the drill rig to the core yard every shift. On completion of geological and geotechnical logging, Laurentia Exploration or Sayona personnel and/or their representatives finished processing the core and sent the samples to the laboratory.

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

Internal reviews of core handling, sample preparation and laboratory procedures were conducted on a regular basis by both Laurentia Exploration or Sayona personnel and/or by their representatives. The CP for the resource estimate, Mr. Alain Carrier, P.Geo., completed an independent logging and sampling review, and conducted re-sampling of selected core intervals. The results of the CP’s independent re-sampling programme are satisfactory. Independent (Technominex) and internal (Sayona) CPs also conducted site visits and reviewed the application of core logging and sampling protocols and procedures. During the 2024 Summer-fall campaign, sampling was conducted at Service MNG in Val-d’Or and at Services Technominex in Rouyn-Noranda. The drill core was logged and sampled by experienced geologists (Sayona/Laurentia Exploration) at the Moblan site, at the Chatillon camp. Sayona has continued the same sampling procedures as for the 2022-2023 campaign. The transportation of the core was handled by these two companies (MNG and Technominex). The cores were palletised at the site after logging and alternately transported by these two service companies. The delivery of the samples to the ALS laboratory was carried out by MNS (in Val-d'Or) and Technominex (in Rouyn-Noranda). The 2024 core storage is located at the LAN mining site in La Corne, and the storage of pulp and rejects is at the warehouse in Amos. The sample preparation, security and analytical procedures are consistent with current industry standards and are appropriate and acceptable for the styles of mineralisation identified and will be appropriate for use in mineral resource estimation. There are no identified drilling, sampling or recovery factors that materially impact the adequacy and reliability of the results of the drilling programme on the Project.

	Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
	Mineral tenement and land tenure status		Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.		Moblan is situated in the northwestern part of the Province of Québec, Canada. The Moblan Property, host to the lithium mineral resources outlined in the 2024 MRE consists of 20 claims (roughly 433 ha or 4.3 km2) held by Sayona Nord (60%) and Investissement Québec (40%). The Moblan Property is subject to a 1.5 to 2.5% Gross Overriding Revenue (‘GOR’) royalty payable to Lithium Royalty Corporation.
			The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.		All claims are in good standing as of July 7, 2025. Claims are currently owned 60% by Sayona Nord Inc. (101628) and 40% by Investissement Québec (19383). On 31 December 2023, SOQUEM transferred its 40% participation in Moblan Property claims to Investissement Québec. Investissement Québec is now a 40% partner in the Moblan Property (according to the document entitled “Moblan joint venture agreement deed of assignment” dated 31 December 2023. There are no impediments that have been identified for operating in the Project areas.
	Exploration done by other parties		Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.		The current Properties cover and overlap many historical mining and exploration properties. The boundaries and names of those properties have evolved following changes in ownership, option agreements, or land packages as claims were abandoned or added. Exploration work has been varied (e.g., prospecting, mapping, geophysics, geochemistry, drilling, etc.) and has focused on a variety of commodities (e.g., precious metals, base metals, and, more recently, critical and strategic minerals). Interest in lithium in the area began in the 1960s inside the current limits of the Moblan Property. Surface prospecting and trenching performed by Muscocho Explorations Ltd in 1963 resulted in the discovery of numerous lithium-bearing dykes. A few of the dykes had been sampled earlier and revealed high grades of lithium oxide. Twenty-eight (28) lithium-bearing pegmatite dykes have been discovered in six (6) separate areas on the Moblan Property between 1992 and 2004, during work conducted by Abitibi Lithium Corporation. The current Project has been the subject of significant exploration and drilling efforts, including geophysics, geochemistry, historical studies, metallurgical testing and engineering studies.
	Geology		Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.		The Properties host several mineral occurrences and showings. These (and other adjacent) occurrences highlight the strong potential of the area for (i) Li pegmatite deposits; (ii) Cu-Zn VMS deposits; (iii) Au orogenic quartz-carbonate veins and disseminated sulphide deposits; (iv) Ni-Cu-PGE magmatic sulphide deposits; and (v) Au-Cu porphyry systems (e.g., Troilus Gold). The economic potential of the Moblan Property is for lithium mineralisation (spodumene pegmatites). Lithium-bearing pegmatites were grouped into four (4) dyke swarms: Main, South, New South and Moleon. Each corresponds to a series of stacked lithium-bearing dykes of variable thicknesses separated by faults

	Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
					The Main group comprises 5 lithium pegmatite dykes oriented E-W and dipping gently to the north (N260°/-20°) and two dykes oriented approximately N-S and dipping steeply to the west (N180°/-70°). This swarm extends laterally E-W for approximately 1500 m and 500 m N-S. In this group, the thickest dyke has an average intercept length of 25 m. The South group comprises 12 dykes oriented E-W and almost sub-horizontal or dipping gently to the south (N260°/-10°) and one dyke oriented approximately N-S and dipping steeply to the west (N180°/-70°). This swarm extends laterally E-W for approximately 1800 m and 300 m N-S. In this group, the thickest dyke has an average intercept length of 45 m. The New South group comprises 12 dykes oriented E-W and dipping moderately to the north (N260°/-5°) and one dyke oriented approximately N-S and dipping steeply to the west (N180°/-70°). This swarm extends laterally E-W for approximately 1800 m and 300 m N-S. In this group, the thickest dyke has an average intercept length of 29 m. The Moleon group comprises 1 dyke oriented E-W and nearly sub-horizontal or dipping gently to the south (N260°/-5°) and 9 dykes oriented N-S and dipping steeply to the west (N180°/-70°). This swarm extends laterally N-S for approximately 750 m and 250 m E-W. In this group, the thickest dyke has an average intercept length of 26 m.
	Drill hole Information		A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: •      easting and northing of the drill hole collar •      elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole •      collar dip and azimuth of the hole •      down hole length and interception depth •      hole length.		Refer to previous exploration releases for the drill hole information of the previously reported intercepts (ASX announcements of 26 April 2022; 27 June 2022; 17 April 2023, 11 July 2023, 22 October 2023, 27 May 2024, 13 June 2024, 27 August 2024, 30 January 2025, 27 April 2025). Material information on the Project’s drill holes is illustrated on the figures (plan views, sections, results tables) in ASX Announcements of April, July and October 2023, and in May, June, and August 2024, 30 January 2025, and 27 April 2025. The coordinates in the figures and the tables are in metres (UTM NAD83 Zone 18), and the elevation is in metres above sea level. The selection of the most significant drill hole intercepts was based on high metal factors (%Li2O content x length in metres) for intervals in spodumene pegmatite dykes. In ASX Announcements of April, July and October 2023, of May and June 2024 and of January 2025 and 27 April 2025, the table includes collar dip and azimuth of the hole, down hole length, interception depth, and hole length. Depending on the azimuths and plunges of the selected boreholes, the drilled lengths are apparent and do not reflect true thicknesses. The CPs were provided with all necessary detailed drill hole information to complete the 2024 MRE and 2024 DFS.
			If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.		The Project is at an advanced stage of exploration, with a reported mineral resource, ongoing engineering studies, and a substantial database of 986 drillholes (198,100.35m). All the details are therefore not presented in table form. Drilling resumed on the Project after the publication of the 2024 MRE and while engineering studies on the Project were still being carried out. The new 2024 drilling results are not included in the 2024 MRE. The CPs do not believe that their omission will materially affect the 2024 MRE. The new drilling results will have an influence mainly on the periphery of the current resources, potentially contributing to the conversion of resources

	Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
					(upgrading) and adding new resources (ASX Announcements of July and October 2023, May, June, August 2024, and January and April 2025).
	Data aggregation methods		In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.		Significant assay intercepts are reported as the weighted average over total pegmatite core length. Li2O grades do not show great variations (coefficient of variation of 0.85). Based on statistical analysis, no capping is required, and no capping was applied to the Project’s Li2O grades. Refer to previous exploration releases for the drill hole information of previously reported intercepts.
			Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.		Aggregation of Li2O grades to obtain the weighted average of a significant intercept is constrained within single pegmatite dykes.
			The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.		No metal equivalent values were used.
	Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths		These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.		The reported significant assay intervals represent apparent widths. Refer to previous exploration releases for the drill hole information of previously reported intercepts.
			If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.		Drilling is not always perpendicular to the dip of mineralisation, and true widths are less than downhole widths. Lithium pegmatites correspond to a series of stacked dykes of variable true thicknesses.
			If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’).		Pegmatite intercepts (%Li2O over m) are expressed over downhole length (not over true width).
	Diagrams		Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.		Refer to the figures in previous resources and exploration releases (ASX Announcement of April, July and October 2023, and May, June and August 2024, and January and April 2025) for illustrations of previously reported holes and assays and for the block model results of the 2024 MRE.

	Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
	Balanced reporting		Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.		All assay results were used to estimate and report the 2024 MRE and for the engineering studies.
	Other substantive exploration data		Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.		The reported drill results are consistent with geological observations and the mineral resource estimate as described. Metallurgical testing, geomechanical, geotechnical and environmental studies, and condemnation drilling were completed for engineering purposes. No other meaningful exploration data are reported.
	Further work		The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).		Further work includes additional drilling to outline the geometry and extent of the lithium pegmatite dyke swarms identified to date. Exploration and step-out drilling is planned to extend the limits of the mineralised system and potentially discover additional pegmatite dykes.
			Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.		Refer to the figures in previous exploration releases (ASX Announcements of April, July and October 2023, and May, June and August 2024, and January and April 2025) for illustrations of previously reported holes and assays.

	SAYONA MINING LIMITED
Date: July 22, 2025	By:	/s/ Dylan Roberts
		Name: Dylan Roberts
		Title: Company Secretary and General Counsel